Steve Deckert
|
UPDATE - JUNE 24
So I'm having a fascinating experience with the Anniversary Amp's dynamics and resolution on two different sets of speakers that sound completely different from each other. Set A is actually an array of 4 drivers done in such a way to achieve perfect time alignment and frequency balance without using a crossover. The imaging of this system is 100% real 3D as are all of the timbres and tone, it is nearly perfect with zero mid-bass bloat... a real hardcore audiophiles dream. Set B is a pair of 15 inch full-range drivers that are the best in that category that I have ever heard. They are warm, slightly rolled, fast, and hit like a live concert at live levels so the dynamics and projection are completely captivating.
What makes these two speaker systems more interesting is the 6dB difference in efficiency. 94dB vs. 100dB. You wouldn't think that's very much but it's actually huge... transformative on an almost epic level when listening to a lower power SET amp such as the Zen Triodes.
So to greatly oversimplify things, one (the 94dB system A) sounds real and ULTRA refined with scary detail and perfect 3D imaging and the other has amazing projection and slam with a softer top end to compensate making it actually sound completely real when you are listening to amplified music that was recorded.
If the two were the same efficiency, the only difference in frequency balance would be that system A has zero mid-bass bloat and an extended top-end, and system B has an exaggerated mid-bass hit like virtually all PA gear, which ironically makes it sound real on todays pop music and classic rock, jazz, blues. It actually comes from the low compliance suspension on the drivers, not the box!
I spent a night with system A listening to UltraAnalogue's master tapes of which I know the variables of how it was recorded. It sounded completely 100% real and amazingly loud for a 2 watt amp.
I spent the next night with system B listening to digital favorites, most 24 bit, and many with good rhythm sections, and played it 6 dB louder because I could. That was a holy crap moment that will definitely keep me coming back for more... it was so good. The incredible projection and tight focus made for very real imaging, but more like they are in front of you in your room vs. you are in the recording space hearing it live.
Tonight, I decided to throw another UAR master tape at system B to see what that is like, and lost interest right away. It was harder sounding, the projection and mid-bass hit potential of the tight cones featured the foreground and I could no longer hear the large room. I was amazed at how the huge 3D soundstage ie., the room, was gone and the musicians were in my face pushing the sound at me as if they weren't happy with my rate of absorption.
In system A everything was slightly smaller but in a space 30 times larger. In system B everything was twice as big but in a space no bigger than my listening room.
Which system would demo better at a show, even at DECFEST? System B would kill it big time. Only those who steal the room in the middle of the night would pick system A which is perhaps twice or three times as refined and nuanced. Still, I find myself having had a steady diet of System A type systems for years, wanting to get into system B and do a donut around the parking lot a few times and then feel the wind in my face as I get sideways through second gear with corn fields on both sides... So I guess the reality is do you want a Rolls Royce or an American Muscle car with a big block.
The 25th Anniversary Zen Triode amplifier gave me both with nothing more than switching out speakers... now that's a frikin amplifier!
Happy listening... I can't stop!
Steve
|