When I started this thread, Acetone and deucekazoo asked if there was a difference in the sound of the Melamine baffles compared to the standard plywood and hardwood baffles.
A few days ago, I completed the Betsy and Betsy Deuce baffles and installed the drivers. Last night, I finally had a chance to check them out in my home listening room and was able to A / B them with a pair of red oak plywood baffles. Since I didn't have a pair of Betsy Deuces on hand, the comparison was only made with the single driver Betsy version.
As Acetone and deucekazoo suspected, the hard surface of the Melamine definitely does have an impact on the sound ..... and since both the front and back of the baffle is made from the same material it is fairly easy to hear with a revealing front end and amplifier.
Deucekazoo offered the word "bounce" ..... and that is a pretty good description of what I heard from the Melamine baffles.
The Melamine surface adds a bit of "sparkle" to the sound in comparison with the red oak plywood.
The effect was interesting and enjoyable with most recordings that I played ..... but on recordings that were a bit "thin" tonally or a bit "hot" in the upper frequencies, it could be too much of a good thing .....
I hear pretty much the same thing from baffles made from Bubinga and Purpleheart hardwoods. They have excellent control and detail, but if the source (recording) is not well balanced they can be a little "over the top".
There's that system matching thing again .....
If anyone should decide to make a pair of baffles from this material for themselves, you might want to have a couple of spare jigsaw blades and a spare router bit on hand ..... since whatever was used for the "core" on the particular Melamine panels I used laid waste to my blade and bit .....
Twelve days and counting to Decware Fest 2018 .....
Everyone have a safe trip,
Randy