Cost is generally a good metric and is used for most planning, i.e., Cost/Benefit Ratio. Generally we look at cost from a personal POV but know that the true cost is typically much greater. If we all follow the "leave it on" strategy (not just for our tube amps) then cost might need to include additional power plants, pollution/sickness, environmental degradation, etc.
If I had special tubes I would possibly leave my equipment on despite the "cost." No one has chimed in with other component parts that might fail, such as capacitors, transformers? A trip back to Decware would really get expensive.
But here's a "philosophical" angle. Climate change will only be mitigated if every user of resources cuts back as far as possible (not just what's convenient). It's amazing that the Average American Household uses almost 11,000 KWh/yr! I'm not a paragon of conservation but I use half that. (I do have natural gas though.

) It's no wonder the planet is heading towards collapse. I don't know what a "carbon neutral" world would look like but we all might be pedaling bicycle generators while we listened to music!

Edit: One practical reason NOT to leave the amps on and unattended is the possibility of a random tube failure that might result in amp damage if not caught. I left my house for an hour with my ZMA on and when I returned there was a super loud, distorted, tone coming from the speakers. I think I had a transient fault in an input tube.