Lon
Seasoned Member
  

"Love without guts is worthless!" Philip K. Dick
Posts: 25799
|
Well, I'll say this: it has a very similar sound to the Mk II but makes the Mk II seem a bit "compressed" -- which is not always a bad thing. In a way it is similar to the differences between EL34 and KT66 output tubes in my Torii Mk III. There's a bit more of an open sound, which makes one seem to hear a bit further into the soundstage, a bit more depth.
The "compressed" feel of the Mk II shows up in a very appealing bass signature; the DS has a hair quicker, just a hair thinner presentation.
At this very moment I'd say "well, the difference really isn't three grand worth. And I think in six months I might say the same thing. Three grand! But I spent it, and I won't be surprised if in six months I wouldn't ever want to go back. It's going to season well, I feel it, and that is the experience I have with the PWD Mk I and II. Already with just a few hours of use a raggedy treble and phasey sound has cleaned up. I can't wait to hear what this sounds like in a few weeks.
Right now, I'm listening to some of my old band rehearsal tapes transferred to CDR.
|
Back to top
|
HR-1,ZBIT,ZROCK3,SEWE300B,CSP3-25mod; Rega RP3 all GrooveTracer mods;PSAudio:PST+DSD, DAC Mk II, P15,NPC,PowerBases,AC-12 pwr cbls, Reference spkrcbls; Mapleshade SamsonV3; VooDoo:Cremona+Amati interconnects;Stack EQ; headphones: Sennheiser HD800S,ZMF Ori,Oppo PM1
IP Logged
|