Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Decware Audio Forums
04/29/24 at 14:25:48 




Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Exploring Bass (Read 16326 times)
GroovySauce
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 825
Exploring Bass
07/04/23 at 15:32:19
 
I’ve been messaging with another forum member about the ZR2 and bass. Bass is often talked about, yet I don’t hear the conversation going into the different ways bass interacts with the rest of the music and pressurized the room. How do we describe the different ways bass sounds and feels? I put together a playlist that showcases different bass sounds and feels. I’ve made some brief listening notes. I’m inviting others to share their listening notes so we as a community get a better understanding of how to language what we hear when it comes to bass.

A quick observation about bass. Bass seems to “carry” the higher frequencies around the room. This is why adding a boost to the lower midrange down through sub-bass into infrasound has the psychoacoustical effect of expanding the soundstage and giving an enveloping experience. This one part of why the ZR2 is such a magic maker.

I put together a playlist with some tracks that demonstrate different ways bass pressurized the room and sounds. I’ve added brief listening notes about each track. Often when I see people ask for bass demo tracks they get a bunch of suggestions that are usually mass quantities or into infrasound bass, not interesting or textured bass. The tracks in this playlist are demonstrations of interesting, textured and nuanced bass.

There is a lot going on in the bass range. If we look at a typical frequency response chart we see that 10-100hz, 100-1,000hz and 1,000-10,000hz each equal ~30% of the audible spectrum. My understanding is this is the psychoacoustic scale. Meaning most of use can easily distinguish between 60hz and 70hz, 600hz and 700hz, 6,000hz and 7,000hz. It’s extremely difficult (can it be done?) to make a distinction between 5,000 and 5,010hz.

From a different perspective a 50hz wave length is 22.6 feet (271.2 inches) a 5,000hz wave length is 2.71 inches.

10hz to 20hz is infrasound. So 20+hz. Still that is a lot of information.

The songs selected I find offer a good demonstration of the different way bass sounds and feels. I also find them fun.

The playlist!

https://open.qobuz.com/playlist/15808812

https://tidal.com/browse/playlist/12c04224-060a-4de8-b0bf-a029e2ce7913


Michael E - Beauty & Seduction | the continual bass hits are sharp and quick. When played loudly, almost anxiety producing as it can sound (almost like) the drivers are bottoming out. There is no distortion or any artifacts.

Without changing tubes I use this track as a gauge to see if tubes are going soft.

Elder Island - Garden | Rolling bass. A few quick hits then a long slower wave rolls through the room.

Sambox - Yakwa | Smooth rolling bass with a little bit of texture.

Sambox - Darling | Violent bass hits, as fast as the hit happens it’s gone. Around 30 seconds in the hits change. There is still the violent hit along with a sliding bass line.

Solar Moon - Sugar Mode | Slow deliberate bass. Hangs around the room for a bit. Slowly fills and empties the room of bass(pressure)

Roos Jonker & Dean Tippet - Dean | The bass sounds like it was recorded in highly absorbent room. As if someone went in and artificially took the reverb off the bass.

Gone Gone Beyond or The Human Experience* - In too Deep | Bass pressure on and off. There is texture to it as well.

*I’ve always know the group as “the Human Experience” not sure why it’s showing up as Gone Gone Beyond now.

Opium Moon - Gravity = Love | Bass has so much texture and decay. Rumbles and flows through and around the room.

Opiuo - Snorkle | Starting at ~1:17 Explosive bass. What I find so interesting about this track is the dead space, lack of sound. If someone had a mute button that was instantly fast and didn’t make any kind of audible noise turning it on and off to the music this would be the track to demonstrate that effect.

Spunkshine - The Cautioned Apparatus | Fat juicy balls of bass! Really wild, sounds like large balls of bass all over the place. lots of fun. It’s a head scratcher how is achieved and played back.

Yaima - Our Game | Wall of pressure! After the wall of pressure the bass sloshes around the room.

I didn't pick songs like "Flight of the Cosmic Hippo" or "Train Song" as there is nothing inherently different about the bass than you will find in other songs. Both of those song have a focus on the bass for sure.

The room has a lot to do with how bass is perceived. Tracks like Opiuo - Snorkle the silence is really room dependent.

If you want something that has outrageous sub into infrasound textured bass you can try Mirage of Deep - Tokio I’ve never hear or should I say felt bass like this ever. So much nuance, texture, subtly and character. I also don't think most systems can reproduce it.

I’d love to hear others listening notes on the bass. Most of the tracks you can hear what I’m noting in the first minute of the song, except the one that starts at ~1:17.
Back to top
 
 

Maximus NEO TT|ViV Rigid Float TA | Phasemation PP-200 or Hana ML | Sutherland Little Loco MK2 | Innuos ZENith MK3 | LampizatOr GA TRP | EMIA Remote Autoformer | STL "Super Tube Rectifier" STR-1002 | SRA Cables | PAP Quintet 15 1.6 Voxativ |Torus AVR15
  IP Logged
Kamran
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 949
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #1 - 07/04/23 at 16:53:08
 
Brilliant topic to explore with the community at large. Can’t wait to dig in to the playlist!
Back to top
 
 

Innuos Pulse Streaming Transport and Phoenix Net Switch-Holo Audio Spring 3 KTE DAC-Ic0n4 Autoformer Passive Pre-Sarah 300B SET Amp-ZBIT-GIK Room Treatment-Caintuck Audio Magnum Baffles—Li Audio Fast 15 Drivers-P.I. Audio MajikBuss & Puritan PSM 156 Conditioners
  IP Logged
will
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 2926
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #2 - 07/04/23 at 17:52:27
 
Great idea, I agree. I am afraid a lot of us were conditioned to feel like strong bass that can be masking of bass complexity, and off balance the rest might be feel like good bass.

I got over that in part because loud and inarticulate low bass gives me fatigue. As much though, I really need to hear the nuances and textures of bass while focussing on a setup for good bass integration with the rest, and across recordings. I really don't like what sounds like bass dominance in the overall balance to me. My speakers are smallish, with smaller drivers, and they go pretty low, but not easy to feel strong body hit here and have it work across all music. I love to feel it enough though. I actually think so much of our musical perception is feel as much as hearing.

Given a choice, I would much rather have less very low bass if needed to solve muddle and occasional boom which masks bass speed and complexity. Going for great bass across recordings... tricky, but worth it to me as much as recordings and my system/room will allow. Where the pre-stages can really help, fine tuning the baseline one way or another to better pull different recordings. Going for "real" rather than impressive here, but then, close to real is pretty impressive when it happens.

Exploring a variety of well done bass recordings is a great idea!

A thread like this is when I really am sorry I have not been able to broach quality internet music streaming yet.
Back to top
 
 

All Modified: PSA-P5>DIY Strip/Shunyata Defender>RevolutionMacMini/Amarra-KTE Singxer/Gustardx20pro/ZBIT/CSP3>OldChen 300B/845, Torii IV>Omega S-A-H-O monitors/SVS Micro3000>Pi PCs-DIY PCs, ICs, USB, I2S, Speaker-SR and aluminum w ball bearing feet
  IP Logged
CAJames
Seasoned Member
****


"I've run every
red light on memory
lane."

Posts: 1684
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #3 - 07/04/23 at 21:59:43
 
Quote:
Posted by: GroovySauce      Posted on: Today at 07:32:19

...10hz to 20hz is infrasound. So 20+hz. Still that is a lot of information...



Quote:
Posted by: will      Posted on: Today at 09:52:27

...I got over that in part because loud and inarticulate low bass gives me fatigue. As much though, I really need to hear the nuances and textures of bass ...I really don't like what sounds like bass dominance in the overall balance to me.


This is a great discussion, and something I think about a lot. I'm with Will, I want quality over quantity of bass. A bass drum is about 50 Hz, and the lowest note on a (standard) piano is about 28. I'm going to claim that while there is certainly information down to 20 Hz and perhaps below, there isn't much music below about 40 Hz. And I want to hear the music. I want to hear the details Scott LaFaro's bass in Waltz for Debby. I want to hear the details of the low strings when then dig into the opening of the last movement of Beethoven's 9th. But having the infamous "Telarc bass drum" shake my windows doesn't do that much for me.

My current system sounds good down to about 40 Hz, although a little less good now that I'm between Decware amps. And I'm fine with that. I remember vividly what it sounded (and felt) like when someone wacked the bass drum in the band room. And I live a few miles from the launch pads at Vandenburg SFB so I'm certainly familiar bass and infra bass impact in real life, but that's not what I'm looking for in my sound system. I've also always had relatively small speakers in relatively small rooms so it wasn't something I was going to get anyway, at least without way more work than I was interested in. Bottom line is I'm happy to have my bass heard but not so much felt.


Back to top
 
 

[FOOBAR2000 | Jay's CDT2 MRK3] -> Denafrips Terminator 2 + Gaia
Sumiko Pearwood -> Mapleknoll Athena -> Luxman SUT -> Maple-tree Phono 3E
Woo WA22 -> 2x UFO25s, balanced monos
Omega SAM , Hifiman Arya, Senn HD-650
  IP Logged
Geno
Seasoned Member
****


Without music, life
would be a mistake.

Posts: 2003
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #4 - 07/04/23 at 22:51:56
 
One of the main things I love about open baffles, bi-amped, with a sub amp driving the bass drivers, is the “mid-bass”. Bass that pops. Think, Mingus on the stand-up bass, plucking away.

In my open baffle setup, I ended up taking the REL sub out, because I felt that it muddied the sound. YMMV.
Back to top
 
 

(2)SE84UFO(Balanced Monoblocs) OR Sansui AU-222
Crown sub amp
Cambridge Audio CXN(ModWright) • ZBIT
SL-1210MK5(KAB Mods) Soundsmith Aida MKll cart • Darlington Labs MP-7
Otari MX5050-Bll2 R2R
ZLC Power Cond.
Lii Audio PT-10/W-15 in open baffles
  IP Logged
Mannytheseacow
Ex Member



Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #5 - 07/05/23 at 01:35:56
 
Timely discussion for me as I’ve been bass curious lately.
Reading Steve’s posts about the new folded horns and how they pressurize the room- meanwhile working with Dennis at Acoustic Fields to absorb that pressure.
I was actually quite happy with bass from my F15s but fealt that I had inadequate room treatment. So now that I am adding room treatment it is soaking up some of those bass frequencies, I find the f15s don’t have enough bass. So things actually were better before.
Not to detract too much from the original post. Going to go listen to this playlist as I take the treatment away.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Same Old DD
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 1062
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #6 - 07/05/23 at 04:50:07
 
This is going to be a very interesting discussion and timely indeed.

I have been listening to a lot of older music, especially jazz lately and I have rarely even turned on my H frame subwoofer for almost a month. I do have some noticeable effect from it just being in the room, though.


I do have Tidal and I've enjoyed the items on that playlist.

While I fully agree that there is not much music down low, I do sometimes miss the lower frequencies that are a part of the venue, such as the ultra low impacts from a full orchestra performing in a great theater.
I rarely hear that reproduced well. Those subharmonics are often mud by the time the reproduction process has chewed them up.
I want better.



Back to top
 
 

SE84Cs Mono'ed, Lii Audio F15 OB, W15 "H" Frame Subwoofer, McIntosh MC2500, Lazarus Pre, Dual TT, Ortofon, Kleenline Iso Power, Revox, Crown R-R, Pioneer Elite Digital Source
  IP Logged
JBzen
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 1378
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #7 - 07/05/23 at 09:53:00
 
I think your on the right track GroovySauce. Proper bass reproduction expounds the message to a point that our senses identify with what we hear naturally. It sounds real. A smacking of lips, a string release from pressure of a thunb, the steel claws of a pallet being struck by the harden brass teeth of a escape wheel; all the detail we hear produce a wide range of frequencies.
Maybe, if time permits,, we could try those tracks at Steve's place on the Headwreckers. My room is pretty much in flux at this time.
John
Back to top
 
 

AMC CD8b>XO3>Cambridge CXN2>ZDAC>ZBOX>braided silver/occ> Zrock2>CSP2+>SE84 milflex copper 25th>9AWG silver/copper braid>lii Crystal 10 in Huijgen cabinets. Ortofon 2M Black>JVC QL-F4/Otari MX5050B2>ZP3. Isolation. AC filtering. Room treatment.
  IP Logged
CAJames
Seasoned Member
****


"I've run every
red light on memory
lane."

Posts: 1684
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #8 - 07/05/23 at 17:35:24
 
Quote:
Posted by: Same Old DD      Posted on: Yesterday at 20:50:07

...While I fully agree that there is not much music down low, I do sometimes miss the lower frequencies that are a part of the venue, such as the ultra low impacts from a full orchestra performing in a great theater.


I guess my question is are you really missing frequency or are you missing amplitude aka intensity?

Let me start by being very clear this is JMO/FWIW/YMMV and all that. I'm certainly not trying to tell anyone what they hear or how to listen. This is just my experience.

I've been fortunate that pretty much all my live music experience over the last several years has been listening to great orchestras in great halls. And I  just don't hear sub bass or even low bass in real life. When the music calls for it I hear plenty of mid-bass, generally down to about 60ish Hz, which is roughly an octave above the lowest note on a (standard) piano and close to the lowest note on a double bass, but I just don't hear (or feel) deep bass, much less sub bass.

I feel like my 6 1/2" single driver speakers do a great job of reproducing the frequency response of a symphony orchestra. What they don't do is reproduce the size and power of 80 musicians in a hall that holds thousands of people. But (IMO) that isn't about frequency response, that's about the difference between two speakers 7' apart and 80 musicians on a stage the size of a basketball court. I suspect that recordings with deep bass and systems that can reproduce it tend to give the same "feel" as a concert hall that is pressurized by an orchestra, an orchestra playing loud but not necessarily plumbing the bottom of the frequency spectrum. An example would be when a trumpet section really lets it fly you can feel it. But playing a trumpet loud on my stereo, even if I match the dB, doesn't feel the same. And that isn't because I'm missing deep bass, its because a trumpet in a hall is different than speakers in a listening room.

Now, I'll freely admit I've never heard a 15" open baffle or the new Head Wrecker speakers powered by a Decware amp in a properly treated room so maybe I'm missing out. But back in the day when I lived in the big city and would visit high end stereo dealers I heard plenty of "full range" systems. And they were impressive, but they still didn't sound like a symphony orchestra.
Back to top
 
 

[FOOBAR2000 | Jay's CDT2 MRK3] -> Denafrips Terminator 2 + Gaia
Sumiko Pearwood -> Mapleknoll Athena -> Luxman SUT -> Maple-tree Phono 3E
Woo WA22 -> 2x UFO25s, balanced monos
Omega SAM , Hifiman Arya, Senn HD-650
  IP Logged
JOMAN
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 763
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #9 - 07/05/23 at 19:05:47
 
Quote:
I guess my question is are you really missing frequency or are you missing amplitude aka intensity?


I do agree that reproducing a live experience in our listening spaces is difficult if not impossible to achieve.  However, the fact remains that a handful of instruments are capable of reproducing frequencies below 40Hz.  Piano, Harp, Organ of course and some others.  IMO, FWIW, there is music down there but it's very difficult to resolve, sometimes even in a live venue, and so not heard and appreciated until it is heard.

When it comes to reproducing those frequencies the start point is not the speakers instead it's the source.  Yes of course the rest of the system has to be able to convey those frequencies including the speakers and the room.

Sometimes we try to "cheat" with components that will add intensity and impact and while these may be very good at that they may actually obscure low end frequency reproduction.  We often compare digital sources to analogue sources.  These may be more analogue sounding but at the expense of low frequency reproduction.  Let me say that for many that's more than good enough as these sources can be very good but that "goodness" may come at compromises on the extreme ends of the frequency spectrum.

Recently I've learned that and am now pursuing a very low compromise journey.  That''s my choice and does not mean that will be or should be everyones choice.   I write this only to share and that it may be of some benefit.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
CAJames
Seasoned Member
****


"I've run every
red light on memory
lane."

Posts: 1684
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #10 - 07/05/23 at 21:27:42
 
Quote:
Posted by: JOMAN

...However, the fact remains that a handful of instruments are capable of reproducing frequencies below 40Hz.  Piano, Harp, Organ of course and some others...


Sure, in theory. But in practice, with the exception of pipe organ which I'll claim is a special case, the actual number of notes in the repertoire below 40 Hz is miniscule. And if you want to listen to pipe organ or those rare pieces with bass that low, or electronic music (and that is properly recorded) then that is a different discussion. But you can listen to a whole lot of orchestral music, or jazz or piano music, before you encounter a note that is below 40 Hz, which is 5 lines below the bottom of the bass clef.

Back to top
 
 

[FOOBAR2000 | Jay's CDT2 MRK3] -> Denafrips Terminator 2 + Gaia
Sumiko Pearwood -> Mapleknoll Athena -> Luxman SUT -> Maple-tree Phono 3E
Woo WA22 -> 2x UFO25s, balanced monos
Omega SAM , Hifiman Arya, Senn HD-650
  IP Logged
will
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 2926
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #11 - 07/05/23 at 22:37:15
 
I feel a fair bit of bass here, the floor and furniture vibrations, and my body, but not like folks with big drivers who talk about "chest hits," or stuff rattling. I like bass set to where you don't know it is set, but helping dip down with more clarity as needed. I don't think I get a lot from my sub in terms of extension, but it does help clarify low bass with the HR1s in this room. It took a long time to really find the right volume, phase, cross, and even EQ, but once found, though I have it set to be just barely there, it gives a positive depth and articulation to low bass in this room, and does a little of that foundational thing that enlivens the mids Groovy mentioned. It also always tickles me to hear it thumping away after turning off the amp, and wonder, how can that muffley, low volume stuff be effective... but it is. Needed? Not really here, but better? To me, yes once fairly seamlessly integrated.

What is accuracy seems up for opinion... Accurate feel and balances like listening in good live rooms and studios is probably more what I am after. Admittedly recordings made with phones that are pretty good at capturing the experience must have issues by comparison to being in the room, but I have been impressed with Steve's videos of gear and speakers sounding pretty real. What I hear of his 10" Lii horns is impressive to say the least with the right recordings, showing amazing extension, clarity, and speed. But then, to me, they seem intense. And that intensity conveys to the videos to me.... parts can show somewhat dissociated strong bass parts, and parts feel too clear/sharp to me, though I suspect I might find them more balanced in person. That said, if these recordings are relatively accurate representations, and from Steve's excitement, they are clearly an important breakthrough effort for him, and I get it. They sound amazing, as well as being about music to me... I love lively, fast, balanced... complete resolution and natural speed balances all there. But then, personally, I prefer "not hearing" a speaker or amp or whatever, so guessing my preferences would be for just a little more relaxed sound (not having heard the real horns anyway). What I am wanting to point to, Steve is loving how these speakers have evolved, yet from the videos, they seem to do some things a little "too well" to me, appearing to be bringing out occasional anomalies while being so extended, fast, and clear. But I can't disagree with the captivating pursuit of that sound.

My point being... what is accurate? I mean, we are trying to create beautiful music in our homes, and we can do amazing things these days with gear and room treatment as good as they are getting. Though it has home stereo qualities, I feel like I am getting a musical experience better than music in many great live rooms, better than in some nice studios. Perhaps even "better" than our illustrious developers in ways.

I totally love trying to integrate the "just so" amounts of complex speed, resolution and clarity.... and even some more "hifi" impact and clarity. It is exciting. But I also prefer less signal concentration than I suspect many do. This does not mean less signal density per se, but more complete fine resolution in space, and thus more harmonic expansiveness to feather hardness into clear, lucid music.

But even within my fairly narrowed range of "right," I can get lots of system "signatures" that are pretty well balanced across our musical parameters... Which is right? And are any of mine more "right" than what I interpret (taking the basic sound and knowing it is better) from Steve's recordings of his room? Who knows, but I would not have become such a freaker modifier if I did not find the pursuit of expanding on Steve's work in seeking more complete natural beauty here, making it better for me. And I am always impressed how the setup can keep improving and improving. I am also always impressed at how recordings of Steve's reveal his sound always improving... All of us digging in... we keep finding new ways to improve the whole. This is the creative pursuit I love about system development, it is always awakening and activating.


Back to top
 
 

All Modified: PSA-P5>DIY Strip/Shunyata Defender>RevolutionMacMini/Amarra-KTE Singxer/Gustardx20pro/ZBIT/CSP3>OldChen 300B/845, Torii IV>Omega S-A-H-O monitors/SVS Micro3000>Pi PCs-DIY PCs, ICs, USB, I2S, Speaker-SR and aluminum w ball bearing feet
  IP Logged
Kamran
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 949
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #12 - 07/05/23 at 23:54:06
 
Just opening this up to discussion, but isn’t there an argument to be made that even if most instruments don’t dip below 40Hz, having access to a woofer or sub that goes accurately down to 20Hz or below conveys a better sense of dimensionality as there is still a lot of information/energy below your typical 40Hz.  I thought that was REL’s position too though I could be wrong?  Also, don’t some folks add super tweeters for the same reason? Not because they want or can hear anything above 18,000 Hz, but having access to energies stored above that spectrum nonetheless ads something to the music?
Back to top
 
 

Innuos Pulse Streaming Transport and Phoenix Net Switch-Holo Audio Spring 3 KTE DAC-Ic0n4 Autoformer Passive Pre-Sarah 300B SET Amp-ZBIT-GIK Room Treatment-Caintuck Audio Magnum Baffles—Li Audio Fast 15 Drivers-P.I. Audio MajikBuss & Puritan PSM 156 Conditioners
  IP Logged
JBzen
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 1378
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #13 - 07/06/23 at 08:39:49
 
This is an interesting study on bass interaction with our bodys. Not highly scientific but draws some interesting commonalities that parallels my experience with body resonance created with exposure to frequencies of 10 to 200hz.

https://www.audioholics.com/room-acoustics/bass-the-physical-sensation-of-sound#....

John
Back to top
 
 

AMC CD8b>XO3>Cambridge CXN2>ZDAC>ZBOX>braided silver/occ> Zrock2>CSP2+>SE84 milflex copper 25th>9AWG silver/copper braid>lii Crystal 10 in Huijgen cabinets. Ortofon 2M Black>JVC QL-F4/Otari MX5050B2>ZP3. Isolation. AC filtering. Room treatment.
  IP Logged
CAJames
Seasoned Member
****


"I've run every
red light on memory
lane."

Posts: 1684
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #14 - 07/06/23 at 15:12:07
 
Quote:
Posted by: will      Posted on: Yesterday at 14:37:15

...My point being... what is accurate? I mean, we are trying to create beautiful music in our homes, and we can do amazing things these days with gear and room treatment as good as they are getting...


That's really the bottom line to me. What is accurate is a (potentially) interesting academic discussion but what matters to us is do we like the way our system sounds. And a lot of people like bass, and there is nothing wrong with that.
Back to top
 
 

[FOOBAR2000 | Jay's CDT2 MRK3] -> Denafrips Terminator 2 + Gaia
Sumiko Pearwood -> Mapleknoll Athena -> Luxman SUT -> Maple-tree Phono 3E
Woo WA22 -> 2x UFO25s, balanced monos
Omega SAM , Hifiman Arya, Senn HD-650
  IP Logged
Kamran
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 949
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #15 - 07/06/23 at 15:42:58
 
Agreed with CA James on what is truly important at the end of the day.

GS:  I completed my first listen of the playlist last night and intend to revisit soon as I am breaking in a component and adding some additional room treatment in the near future. That said, Opium Moon was my fav track (probably the most three dimensional of the list in my rig)—dug both Sambox tracks, and appreciated the slow burn of the Solar Moon track.
Back to top
 
 

Innuos Pulse Streaming Transport and Phoenix Net Switch-Holo Audio Spring 3 KTE DAC-Ic0n4 Autoformer Passive Pre-Sarah 300B SET Amp-ZBIT-GIK Room Treatment-Caintuck Audio Magnum Baffles—Li Audio Fast 15 Drivers-P.I. Audio MajikBuss & Puritan PSM 156 Conditioners
  IP Logged
Dominick
Seasoned Member
****


Still like that old
time Rock and Roll!!

Posts: 1165
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #16 - 07/06/23 at 17:40:20
 
Groovy….fantastic thread.  Last night I listened to all the tracks in my work vehicle just to get a sense of the tracks.  Your music selection and accompanying descriptions were spot on. I’m going to pipe them up on my reference system in the next day or so.  

I personally enjoy bass that is dialed in where it’s tight and articulate, while not being overly stated.   Room treatment and the physical dimensions of your listening space can make or break how the bass is perceived as the frequencies pressurize your room.  The last time I heard phenomenal bass was years ago at Decfest with the corner imperial horns.  We’re talking bass that you can feel that goes right through your core.  

With the Err’s in my space, I get fairly articulate bass out of the speakers, but my listening space is lacking room treatment right now, and with my open concept floor plan, a lot of detail gets lost.  Future project is to build panels that can close off the area from my living room to my kitchen area.

For those with subs….placement in the room can play a big part with getting the sound to integrate with your main speakers.  Mine are just  aft of my listening chair.  My powered sub is crossed over just below where my Err’s can’t hit.  My Velodyne is sealed and has a 10” front firing, and a 12” down firing woofer.  Yes it can shake the room, but I really only push it for when I watch movies.  Explosions and planes sound great!!  For my music listening, I like to know it’s there without being overly stated.  

Also… lifting your sub off the floor and getting it on a platform can do wonders.  Watch some of Dennis Folely of Acoustic Fields YouTube videos when he talks about bass….the guys knows his stuff.  His recommendations can really help.  

Dom
Back to top
 
 

Rasp. Pi 4 [Roon], Schiit Bifrost True Multibit DAC, ZBIT, ZROCK2, My Audio Cables Ultra Silver+, ZSB, CSP2+ 25th, DAG Cables, DHC1, Torii MKIV 25th /2 White Zen SE84C+ 25th mono’s, Rega P2 Turntable,Rega Fono MK5, Velodyne Dual Firing Sub, ERR’s [Bubbinga Wood]
  IP Logged
Lon
Seasoned Member
****


"Love without
guts is
worthless!"
Philip K. Dick

Posts: 23544
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #17 - 07/06/23 at 19:38:15
 
I'm not someone who streams so I am not listening to this playlist. Nor is this generally the type of music I listen to so I don't have examples of most here to spin.

I do like tight and yet full bass that is integrated into the whole sound field. "Accurate to what?" I understand. In my case it's accurate to the methods I use to evaluate accuracy.

I do know myself how bass sounds in my room and system. Pre the ZROCK2s that I have I had a very hard time getting a frequency balance that worked for most of my material. I could get a great bass sound BUT there was an overwhelming treble that always made me want more bass. The ZROCK2 has really improved that situation, even though I use it way into the "A" EQ range, diminishing a lot of treble. But I do have a tight and accurate bass sound that fills the room properly.

For accuracy I have four methods to evaluate bass and other frequency levels and overall balance. First: I use tapes and cdrs from tapes that I made when I was in two bands in the second half of the 'eighties. I knew my equipment (first an electronic drum kit, then an acoustic drum kit), my bandmates equipment, the playing of the bandmates, the recording equipment and it was in my own garage apartment, and I engineered the tapes, placed the mics, etc. I've played these recordings on every system that I have had since '90 or so and I know them quite well. When the bass on these sounds like the Sunn amps I used on my drums, the Fender basses and amps used by bandmates, etc. the sound is pretty accurate overall.

I then also play material I know very well from listening over the decades that has great electrical bass playing by for example Michael Henderson or Andy Fraser, and great contrabass violin playing by for example Paul Chambers or Jimmy Garrison. When I can hear their playing with speed and detail and the right amount of tight bloom the bass is just right.

And one final reference I have is my own bass instruments (electric and contrabass violin) and my bass amplification (Fender '59 Reissue Bassman, Fender TV Fifteen Bassman). That lets me gauge not only accuracy of instrumental playback but room interaction.

I love bass! But I don't like to shake the walls and floors. . . .
Back to top
 
 

HR-1,ZBIT,ZROCK2,SEWE300B,CSP3-25mod; Rega RP3 all GrooveTracer mods;PSAudio:PST+DSD, DAC Mk II, P15,NPC,PowerBases,AC-12 pwr cbls, Reference spkrcbls; Mapleshade SamsonV3; VooDoo:Cremona+Amati interconnects, IsoPods; headphones: Sennheiser HD800S,ZMF Ori,Oppo PM1
  IP Logged
GroovySauce
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 825
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #18 - 07/07/23 at 01:19:18
 
A lot of great comments and insights!

Geno, I also removed my stereo subs. I tried a lot of different approaches to get it to sound right. Yes it was very impressive having 3x 12” OB drivers a side. I ended up preferring no subs. My speakers do play below 30hz. If my speakers played to 40hz maybe I could blend them and be much happier with the results.

Manny, is it that they don’t have enough bass or is it that the bass is different than you’re used too? In an untreated room you might have 15-20db or more boost in certain frequencies.

There is an effect that ultra low and infrasound has on music. Many years ago when Wilson Audio released their Thor’s Hammer subwoofer I was at a demonstration. The Alexandria XLF speakers were in the system too, so plenty of bass ability. A choir in a church was played. The presenter then would turn the sub gain from the blended point to off. It was wild how the highs became “more airy” when the sub was active. The voices hung in the air more. So something is going on when the ultra low energy is present.

Is a subharmonic one that goes down from the fundamental? Example, a kick drum at 50hz the first subharmonic is 25hz? is that a thing? I assume that it works that way, I find anything online that discussed that. If that is true then clearly reproducing the subharmonics is something to consider.

As for what is “accurate”? If I’m having a good experience listening to music I’m happy.

CAJames, The instruments themselves might not produce low bass, what about the act of playing them? A kick drum might be 50hz, What is hz of the foot hitting the peddle which is transfering the force into the ground? If the drum kit is on a riser what is the risers frequency that is being picked up? I’m guessing some of that energy is down in the 20hz range. I really don’t know just postulating.

Will nailed it for me. Having complex bass is more desirable than strong bass.
Back to top
 
 

Maximus NEO TT|ViV Rigid Float TA | Phasemation PP-200 or Hana ML | Sutherland Little Loco MK2 | Innuos ZENith MK3 | LampizatOr GA TRP | EMIA Remote Autoformer | STL "Super Tube Rectifier" STR-1002 | SRA Cables | PAP Quintet 15 1.6 Voxativ |Torus AVR15
  IP Logged
Kamran
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 949
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #19 - 07/07/23 at 04:13:00
 
I think accurate is probably the wrong term to use.  My point was to have access to lowest frequencies/energies possible (whether through FR drivers or the aid of subs) positively impacting the entire frequency spectrum.. GS’s church choir example, nails it.

I am also in the camp of complex, articulated bass.  Here’s another suggestion:

Jah Jah Know by Groundation

GS: I was about to start another thread on subs, but since this is related I might as well ask here:

I know your OB subs were based on Rythmik’s direct servo design propagated by GR Research.  The more I read about Direct Servo Subs, the more I thought that on paper, this is a vastly superior design topology. I mean who doesn’t want super clean and controlled bass, which the direct servo design aids? That said, Rythmik subs are not as popular or prevalent (as they should be) compared to say REL or SVS.  I wonder why.

Speaking of direct servo—I was actually thinking of whether it makes sense to get a pair of sealed 12” from Rythmik vs. getting the GR research based OB design.  Both should function very similarly—since they are based on the same design principle.  What made you part with your subs?

A bit of non-sequitur: Stepped in the gym spin class after 4 years and they had 4 PA type of speakers blazing bass heavy music to pump us up:

Here is what was going inside my head:

1) The music sounds like shit.  The bass is overblown and in our collective faces — I guess that’s the point to get the juices flowing—not working on me though.  I wonder if I could ask them to equalize it…yeah, that would go over well with the instructor and other cyclists.  I might even get banned.  Forget it.  

2) Perhaps I need to find a bike that is dead center between the two front speakers vs. being decidedly off to the right of the right speaker. Maybe it will sound better?

This hobby has ruined me….


Back to top
 
 

Innuos Pulse Streaming Transport and Phoenix Net Switch-Holo Audio Spring 3 KTE DAC-Ic0n4 Autoformer Passive Pre-Sarah 300B SET Amp-ZBIT-GIK Room Treatment-Caintuck Audio Magnum Baffles—Li Audio Fast 15 Drivers-P.I. Audio MajikBuss & Puritan PSM 156 Conditioners
  IP Logged
CAJames
Seasoned Member
****


"I've run every
red light on memory
lane."

Posts: 1684
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #20 - 07/07/23 at 04:23:32
 
Quote:
Posted by: GroovySauce      Posted on: Today at 17:19:18


Is a subharmonic one that goes down from the fundamental? Example, a kick drum at 50hz the first subharmonic is 25hz? is that a thing?


I don't think that's a thing. Overtones are thing, undertones are at most an artifact. The fundamental is a low as it goes.

Overtones are the e.g. string vibrating at half, third, quarter etc. the fundamental wavelength to give the harmonics aka overtones. But there is nothing that is twice the fundament wavelength in length to vibrate so nothing to create an "undertone". You can make the same argument with a lot more math doing a Fourier analysis.


 
Back to top
 
 

[FOOBAR2000 | Jay's CDT2 MRK3] -> Denafrips Terminator 2 + Gaia
Sumiko Pearwood -> Mapleknoll Athena -> Luxman SUT -> Maple-tree Phono 3E
Woo WA22 -> 2x UFO25s, balanced monos
Omega SAM , Hifiman Arya, Senn HD-650
  IP Logged
Ghostship
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 155
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #21 - 07/07/23 at 10:35:38
 
What is important is if you're lacking the fundamental frequency, then you will also be missing the harmonics, overtones and timber associated with it.

Even with speakers rated at 30hz, that's usually 6dB down, which means you're losing amplitude, and thus fullness, density, articulation, timber etc. with the associated harmonics and overtones.

But with an actual kick drum, bass, contrabass, contrabassoon, piano, tuba, harp, pipe organ, et al, they are playing full volume at the lower frequencies, thus you hear them as "real". And when those sounds are recreated at volume, your system sounds more "real" as well.

And, this is true not just for the musical instruments and voices, but for room cues as well, whether it's John Lee Hooker tapping his foot or the acoustics of a nightclub or concert hall.

Also, this is why a recording made with musicians/vocals in the same room playing at the same time sounds "live" and "real", as opposed to them each being recorded separately, oftentimes in different sound-treated rooms, then mixed together which sounds less real and more compressed.
Back to top
 

harmonics-square-wave-1200x617.png

Paul Pang Quad Network Switch & Fiber
MSB Premier DAC
Zen Sarah SEWE300B
Cryotone Bundle
Tekton 2-12 Perfect SET Speakers w/ BE Tweeters and Cap & Wiring upgrades
Tekton 2-10 Sub
  IP Logged
Lon
Seasoned Member
****


"Love without
guts is
worthless!"
Philip K. Dick

Posts: 23544
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #22 - 07/07/23 at 11:16:17
 
I agree that the bass dialed in pays off in spades for ambiance and room cues.

I'm less certain that there are recorded overtones from interaction between bass drums and platforms etc.

One thing is certain: the clarity and density that Decware components produce in playback really allows one to hear and tailor the sound of all the frequencies if one wishes. There are a lot of limitations of recordings and rooms, there are less limitations with Decware components matched with excellent sources and speakers. And if you can modify. . .WHOA.
Back to top
 
 

HR-1,ZBIT,ZROCK2,SEWE300B,CSP3-25mod; Rega RP3 all GrooveTracer mods;PSAudio:PST+DSD, DAC Mk II, P15,NPC,PowerBases,AC-12 pwr cbls, Reference spkrcbls; Mapleshade SamsonV3; VooDoo:Cremona+Amati interconnects, IsoPods; headphones: Sennheiser HD800S,ZMF Ori,Oppo PM1
  IP Logged
Same Old DD
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 1062
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #23 - 07/07/23 at 13:48:36
 
CAJames wrote on 07/07/23 at 04:23:32:
I don't think that's a thing. Overtones are thing, undertones are at most an artifact. The fundamental is a low as it goes.

Overtones are the e.g. string vibrating at half, third, quarter etc. the fundamental wavelength to give the harmonics aka overtones. But there is nothing that is half the fundament wavelength in length to vibrate so nothing to create an "undertone". You can make the same argument with a lot more math doing a Fourier analysis.  


I might have mispoken when I called the impuse a subharmonic.
Audible subharmonics are indeed mostly artifacts, in my view. Whether the artifacts originate from the venue or the recording and reproduction processes, subharmonics are usually detrimental to clarity.

But, when you experience a live row of tympany, tuned to a pleasant chord, slam into the venue, one thing that you hear and mostly feel is the initial impact, which is not really tonal.

It is up to your bass reproduction system to attempt to faithfully emulate that enormous impact and clean, subbass capability is the only way I have ever heard work well.  
Often I find it missing from the recordings, but if it is there I want to feel it.
One reason I am still shopping the servo subwoofer systems. That is where I have heard the best impact responses.

No, it's not bass, but that impact can only be emulated by a huge effort from your bass drivers.

Sorry for not being able to describe my notion in a more universally understandable way.
I'm not much of a writer.


Back to top
 
 

SE84Cs Mono'ed, Lii Audio F15 OB, W15 "H" Frame Subwoofer, McIntosh MC2500, Lazarus Pre, Dual TT, Ortofon, Kleenline Iso Power, Revox, Crown R-R, Pioneer Elite Digital Source
  IP Logged
CAJames
Seasoned Member
****


"I've run every
red light on memory
lane."

Posts: 1684
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #24 - 07/07/23 at 15:02:02
 
Quote:
Posted by: Same Old DD

But, when you experience a live row roll of tympany, tuned to a pleasant chord, slam into the venue, one thing that you hear and mostly feel is the initial impact, which is not really tonal.


Yes, I know that feeling. But I will argue that it is in fact totally "tonal" because as you say you can hear it tuned to a pleasant cord. You may have never heard a timpani out of tune or hit the wrong note but I have, and it is just as unpleasant as any other (really loud) wrong note.

And you're right, you do feel it. People around here love their 15" drivers. A timpani is a 30" driver and you literally beat it like a drum. That generates an impulse that you just aren't going to reproduce at home. But not because you are missing low frequencies,  you are missing the energy of the mallet strike that a timpani focuses and couples very efficiently to the air. Timpani go down to low C (2 lines below the staff) which is like 65 Hz, but mostly they play above 80 Hz. Most mini-monitors can go well below 80 Hz, but they are missing the 30" woofer so they can play the notes, but they can't really do justice to the impact.

I live close to the launch pads at Vandenberg, and have experienced many rocket launches (at all hours of the day or night). They create a lot of really low bass, and infra bass. And I can assure you that 5, 10 or 20 Hz is a very different experience than what you get listening to the timpani.

Of course, how you go about reproducing the unreproducible in a way that makes you happy is entirely up to you.


Back to top
 
 

[FOOBAR2000 | Jay's CDT2 MRK3] -> Denafrips Terminator 2 + Gaia
Sumiko Pearwood -> Mapleknoll Athena -> Luxman SUT -> Maple-tree Phono 3E
Woo WA22 -> 2x UFO25s, balanced monos
Omega SAM , Hifiman Arya, Senn HD-650
  IP Logged
CAJames
Seasoned Member
****


"I've run every
red light on memory
lane."

Posts: 1684
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #25 - 07/07/23 at 15:42:48
 
Quote:
Posted by: Ghostship      Posted on: Today at 02:35:38
What is important is if you're lacking the fundamental frequency, then you will also be missing the harmonics, overtones and timber associated with it.

Even with speakers rated at 30hz, that's usually 6dB down, which means you're losing amplitude, and thus fullness, density, articulation, timber etc. with the associated harmonics and overtones.


I'm not sure I understand this. If you're listening to a recording at home presumably the fundament and all the overtones are in the recording. If you're listening to a pipe organ play a note at 30 Hz, your system may struggle with the fundamental, but the 60, 90, 120 etc. Hz overtones are all in the recording and you aren't losing them.
Back to top
 
 

[FOOBAR2000 | Jay's CDT2 MRK3] -> Denafrips Terminator 2 + Gaia
Sumiko Pearwood -> Mapleknoll Athena -> Luxman SUT -> Maple-tree Phono 3E
Woo WA22 -> 2x UFO25s, balanced monos
Omega SAM , Hifiman Arya, Senn HD-650
  IP Logged
Ghostship
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 155
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #26 - 07/07/23 at 15:49:44
 
Speaking of tympany:



My orchestra director hated me when this album came out.
Back to top
 

ZfuJvVl.png

Paul Pang Quad Network Switch & Fiber
MSB Premier DAC
Zen Sarah SEWE300B
Cryotone Bundle
Tekton 2-12 Perfect SET Speakers w/ BE Tweeters and Cap & Wiring upgrades
Tekton 2-10 Sub
  IP Logged
Same Old DD
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 1062
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #27 - 07/07/23 at 15:53:36
 
I am trying to seperate the initial impactful atonal rush of sound from the completely tonal harmonic sounds that emerge from a well struck percussive instrument of any sort. I used tympany as an example because the difference in time between the impact of a still head and the tone created as the head begins to vibrate is more substantial than most any other percussive types of sound.
Honestly, chimes do not seem to exhibit this property so dramatically as any drum, even standing a foot away.

One happens almost instantly, but enough time elapses (tiny number of milliseconds) that there is always a noticeable difference between the two; impact and tonality.
And as the tone of the drums build due to the initial impact well before the head has begun to vibrate, another set of challenges arises for any reproduction system.
Getting past attempting that impulse and settling into the tonal characteristics.

I don't know, maybe I've looked at too much music through a 'scope or an analyzer or something trying to work a sound reinforcement system for so many years.

In trying to reinforce an outdoor orchestral performance without a fabulous theater to contain and maintain the music, you get to know just how close to impossible all this is that we are making an attempt at discussing.

I believe that reproducing both the initial impact along with the ensuing harmonies are each as essential as the other, the Litmus test if you will, for reproducing the actual sound of a drum or a set of claves or a triangle. Doing so quite well approaches the impossible. I don't care how good your gear is.

As you said, we are missing that 32 inch membrane being hammered. As for a triangle, just how fast is your tweeter, today? Can it distinguish itself in this humidity, barometric pressure, temperature, noise floor, etc?

Back to top
 
 

SE84Cs Mono'ed, Lii Audio F15 OB, W15 "H" Frame Subwoofer, McIntosh MC2500, Lazarus Pre, Dual TT, Ortofon, Kleenline Iso Power, Revox, Crown R-R, Pioneer Elite Digital Source
  IP Logged
CAJames
Seasoned Member
****


"I've run every
red light on memory
lane."

Posts: 1684
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #28 - 07/07/23 at 16:32:25
 
Quote:
Posted by: Same Old DD      Posted on: Today at 07:53:36

I am trying to seperate the initial impactful atonal rush of sound from the completely tonal harmonic sounds that emerge from a well struck percussive instrument of any sort.


I know exactly what you are talking about. That rush may seem "atonal" because it is so intense, but it is more or less an actual note. More for a timpani a little less for a concert bass drum. You feel the energy, because it resonates with your body, but your ear may not be able to process the frequency because it is overloaded.

I've had an analogous but different experience listening to a big band trumpet section in a club. When they lean into it you get a similar physical feeling, but it much higher frequency that is more isolated in your head than the chest and torso like you get from a drum. And then with a rocket launch it is literally a whole body experience, you can feel the waves cycling through your body 3 or 5 or 10 times a second.


Back to top
 
 

[FOOBAR2000 | Jay's CDT2 MRK3] -> Denafrips Terminator 2 + Gaia
Sumiko Pearwood -> Mapleknoll Athena -> Luxman SUT -> Maple-tree Phono 3E
Woo WA22 -> 2x UFO25s, balanced monos
Omega SAM , Hifiman Arya, Senn HD-650
  IP Logged
Same Old DD
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 1062
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #29 - 07/07/23 at 16:32:50
 
I think I get what Ghostship is expressing.
The harmonics sort of "ride" along the fundamental and if the fundamental tone is lacking in intensity, some of the richness of the harmonics is also lacking.

At least that's what I hear happening.
Back to top
 
 

SE84Cs Mono'ed, Lii Audio F15 OB, W15 "H" Frame Subwoofer, McIntosh MC2500, Lazarus Pre, Dual TT, Ortofon, Kleenline Iso Power, Revox, Crown R-R, Pioneer Elite Digital Source
  IP Logged
4krow
Seasoned Member
****


IMAGINE WHIRLLED
PEAS

Posts: 1607
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #30 - 07/07/23 at 16:39:25
 
One of my favorite recordings is Fleetwood Mac's Mystery to me. There are a couple places in two of the songs where a large drum is hit and if your system is up to it, you will actually hear the skin of this giant drum 'flap'. It has happened in other albums but not as noticeably. To hear not only the sound of an instrument but also the mechanics is the difference.
Back to top
 
 

Decware 34I.3 integrated amp/Forte' 3 bass amp/Velodyne SMS-1 bass mngmnt system/Decware ZOB speakers/Audio Nirvana 8" bass drivers/Xiang Seng DAC/ LR Audio Computer/Rega Apollo R CDP/Emotiva ERC3 CDP/BPT 3.0 power cond.
  IP Logged
Same Old DD
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 1062
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #31 - 07/07/23 at 18:58:00
 
CAJames wrote on 07/07/23 at 16:32:25:
I know exactly what you are talking about. That rush may seem "atonal" because it is so intense, but it is more or less an actual note. More for a timpani a little less for a concert bass drum. You feel the energy, because it resonates with your body, but your ear may not be able to process the frequency because it is overloaded.

I've had an analogous but different experience listening to a big band trumpet section in a club. When they lean into it you get a similar physical feeling, but it much higher frequency that is more isolated in your head than the chest and torso like you get from a drum. And then with a rocket launch it is literally a whole body experience, you can feel the waves cycling through your body 3 or 5 or 10 times a second.


I would love to attend a really impressive concert with you!

I have been to so many myself, but I was often working or I was with someone who was just trying to "get into the whole classical thing" or someone with just a line on getting tickets for a venue. Either way, no care for the actual music being performed right in front of them, LIVE, real life!

I have tried to take my wife a few times, but she is overly sensitive to anything loud. One crescendo and she's ready to go.

The best times I have had is when I went alone. Five tickets near the middle of an auditorium, two on each side vacant is the best. One rare occurrence.

But having a listening partner who knows music and instruments, who also just loves the live performance is a rare thing for me.

Grin


Back to top
 
 

SE84Cs Mono'ed, Lii Audio F15 OB, W15 "H" Frame Subwoofer, McIntosh MC2500, Lazarus Pre, Dual TT, Ortofon, Kleenline Iso Power, Revox, Crown R-R, Pioneer Elite Digital Source
  IP Logged
CAJames
Seasoned Member
****


"I've run every
red light on memory
lane."

Posts: 1684
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #32 - 07/07/23 at 19:50:51
 
Quote:
Posted by: Same Old DD      Posted on: Today at 10:58:00

I have tried to take my wife a few times, but she is overly sensitive to anything loud....

...having a listening partner who knows music and instruments, who also just loves the live performance is a rare thing for me.


It's funny that in popular culture it is the woman who drags her man kicking and screaming to the concert. But way back when in dating situations, I found it much easier to take a girl to a ball game than the Philharmonic. They would go, but more as an excuse to get dressed up and go out to dinner, not to hear the concert. Lately I've been fortunate to be able to fly out to see my buddy and his family. We grew up playing in orchestra together and we go to the Cleveland Orchestra or see visiting orchestras at the University of Michigan, most recently the Berlin Phil. Both our wives are happy to be left out.

Sorry, I guess I've wandered pretty far OT....

Back to top
 
 

[FOOBAR2000 | Jay's CDT2 MRK3] -> Denafrips Terminator 2 + Gaia
Sumiko Pearwood -> Mapleknoll Athena -> Luxman SUT -> Maple-tree Phono 3E
Woo WA22 -> 2x UFO25s, balanced monos
Omega SAM , Hifiman Arya, Senn HD-650
  IP Logged
Same Old DD
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 1062
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #33 - 07/07/23 at 23:31:50
 
I have certainly wandered as well.

I do get your point about ears becoming overloaded. I suppose that is a constant bane we all face in trying to get things to sound real.
Sure, I can shut my ears down, but that leads me farther away from what I seek, which is a sound that is as close to real as I can get.

I'm going to let this idle for a while as the topic of Exploring Bass continues.

I look forward to more input from all!
Back to top
 
 

SE84Cs Mono'ed, Lii Audio F15 OB, W15 "H" Frame Subwoofer, McIntosh MC2500, Lazarus Pre, Dual TT, Ortofon, Kleenline Iso Power, Revox, Crown R-R, Pioneer Elite Digital Source
  IP Logged
Same Old DD
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 1062
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #34 - 07/08/23 at 03:00:56
 
4krow,
I intend to stream some "Mystery To Me" later and see if I can find that flap between the drum attack recorded well.

Mick Fleetwood, once they made some money, had an impressive "too BIG" drum set.
I've only seen them a few times, but more than once he had an enormous kick and his low floor tom was huge and tuned very low. It looked like two small bass drums braced together, but I never got a good close look at it.

To say that his drums were all toned lowish would be an understatement.
Back to top
 
 

SE84Cs Mono'ed, Lii Audio F15 OB, W15 "H" Frame Subwoofer, McIntosh MC2500, Lazarus Pre, Dual TT, Ortofon, Kleenline Iso Power, Revox, Crown R-R, Pioneer Elite Digital Source
  IP Logged
4krow
Seasoned Member
****


IMAGINE WHIRLLED
PEAS

Posts: 1607
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #35 - 07/08/23 at 14:39:30
 
DD, There are a few of them on the album, but the one that is biggest would be the last song as sung by Christine McVie. It starts out with a beautiful guitar solo ending in 3 strummed chords, followed by the bass drum that has presence like few other bass notes that I have ever heard.
Back to top
 
 

Decware 34I.3 integrated amp/Forte' 3 bass amp/Velodyne SMS-1 bass mngmnt system/Decware ZOB speakers/Audio Nirvana 8" bass drivers/Xiang Seng DAC/ LR Audio Computer/Rega Apollo R CDP/Emotiva ERC3 CDP/BPT 3.0 power cond.
  IP Logged
Kamran
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 949
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #36 - 07/09/23 at 04:55:38
 
Here’s another track I listened to tonight (cranked it up a bit as the wife and kids were at my in-laws) that has deep articulate bass that you feel in your bones, but it’s not in your face punchy type.

Back to top
 
 

Innuos Pulse Streaming Transport and Phoenix Net Switch-Holo Audio Spring 3 KTE DAC-Ic0n4 Autoformer Passive Pre-Sarah 300B SET Amp-ZBIT-GIK Room Treatment-Caintuck Audio Magnum Baffles—Li Audio Fast 15 Drivers-P.I. Audio MajikBuss & Puritan PSM 156 Conditioners
  IP Logged
Bilyeaux
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 149
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #37 - 07/10/23 at 13:32:40
 
Nice track Kamran, and artist. It is added to my Asian grouping in Qobuz
Back to top
 
 

ARC LS25MK2, UFO2.1 & Denafrips Pontus II DAC, PSA P300 Regen, Rega P6 w/ NEO and Rega MM Phono, Marantz CD6006, Bluesound Node 2i, Nakamitchi Cassette, Syzygy Sub, Omega JR XRS Towers & 74' Heresy rebuilt from Crites, ZWIRE speaker, DSRXLR, AQ connects
  IP Logged
Kamran
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 949
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #38 - 07/11/23 at 03:07:49
 
Thx—here’s another good one:


living water baptist church
Back to top
 
 

Innuos Pulse Streaming Transport and Phoenix Net Switch-Holo Audio Spring 3 KTE DAC-Ic0n4 Autoformer Passive Pre-Sarah 300B SET Amp-ZBIT-GIK Room Treatment-Caintuck Audio Magnum Baffles—Li Audio Fast 15 Drivers-P.I. Audio MajikBuss & Puritan PSM 156 Conditioners
  IP Logged
Doug
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 274
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #39 - 07/11/23 at 04:04:43
 
Regarding Groovy’s opening “quick observation” that “bass seems to carry the higher frequencies around the room”, I totally agree with this line of thinking.  Having used an unusually wide variety of speakers in my main system across 52 years, ranging from Klipschorns to tiny LS3/5A’s to my current PAP Quintets, I have always found midrange and treble frequencies to be at their best when low bass (30 to 60 hz) is reproduced at realistic volume levels relative to the higher frequencies.  

As an example, when I play a recording of solo piano, which happens daily in our home, the 30 to 60 hz range is clearly heard and felt.  If that part of the frequency range was missing, or significantly down, I would be frustrated to no end. In piano music, the bass notes are, literally, the base of most of this instrument’s repertoire.  Without sensing those big bass strings vibrating in my ears and through my entire body, I would know I was listening to a piano recording, but not for a second would I be able to transport myself to the live recording session.  The piano simply would not sound or feel like a real instrument.  Without hearing the notes C1 through F2 (the bottom octave and a half of commonly used piano bass notes) with real authority and lucidity, the midrange and treble just doesn’t sound right.

When you consider the subtleties, nuances, and seemingly unlimited sound possibilities of felt hammers striking those huge wrapped strings, it’s definitely worth pursuing speakers that are up to the task of delivering all these shadings and variations.  In my case, that means big, fast, light weight, efficient woofers on open baffles.  

All this rambling is, of course, my very personal experience, but I will close with this…….if you haven’t heard these kind of open baffle woofers in your own home, even if you are in a smaller space, give it a try if at all possible.  You very well may end up stunned, like I was, at the intricacies these kind of OB bass drivers deliver, and, you may find a level of articulation in the low notes that you didn’t know was possible.  In addition, the improvement in midrange and treble may also come as a shock.  

By the way, the Eminence Alpha 15A woofer, though no longer $129.95 a pair like they were five years ago, is a fine sounding OB woofer that will give you 80% to 90% of the performance of the high dollar OB woofers.  Why not buy a pair and throw them up on a piece of plywood?

Thanks, Groovy, for initiating a great discussion.
Back to top
 
 

Jay’s CD2T-Mk3
Denafrips Pontus II
ZROCK2 25th Mods
CSP3 25th & Custom Mods
PAP Quintets with Voxativ 1.6
First Watt J2 or Cary 300SEI
driving Voxativs—no crossover
LFD NCSE driving 15” Woofers
  IP Logged
johnnycopy
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 115
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #40 - 07/11/23 at 22:25:18
 
Thanks for the great set list groovysauce.  Great tracks for the topic!

I have always felt the music floats above the bass and when quality open baffle or other subs were added to my system was surprised at improved air and presence.

The first pic shows my current listening with the two bass panels to outside housing 4 fifteen inch open baffle drivers driven by 2 rythmiks.

Your set list is going to make me now add back my four bucket subs into the mains system. Where are they now?

They are n the garage with a big crown amp providing the bottom end to a pair of ob caintuck audio Betsy’s, bothering the neighbours and making washing the car more fun! Pic two is old one with subs shown.

Looking forward to running through your songs with the bucket subs engaged.

Thanks!



Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
CAJames
Seasoned Member
****


"I've run every
red light on memory
lane."

Posts: 1684
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #41 - 07/11/23 at 22:45:58
 
Quote:
Posted by: Doug      Posted on: Yesterday at 20:04:43
...when I play a recording of solo piano, which happens daily in our home, the 30 to 60 hz range is clearly heard and felt....


I'm curious what you're listening to that has notes that low. I listen to a lot of piano music as well, and the number of notes below say 50 Hz (G1) that I run across is miniscule.
Back to top
 
 

[FOOBAR2000 | Jay's CDT2 MRK3] -> Denafrips Terminator 2 + Gaia
Sumiko Pearwood -> Mapleknoll Athena -> Luxman SUT -> Maple-tree Phono 3E
Woo WA22 -> 2x UFO25s, balanced monos
Omega SAM , Hifiman Arya, Senn HD-650
  IP Logged
4krow
Seasoned Member
****


IMAGINE WHIRLLED
PEAS

Posts: 1607
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #42 - 07/12/23 at 03:24:24
 
 I just have to add something here that you guys might get a kick out of. Many years ago, I was invited to a piano recital. The young woman clearly wanted to make an impression, and THAT she did. To this day I have never ever seen anyone bang on the keys like that! I swear her butt came off the bench more than once! I will never forget it, and I left at 'half time', a little shaken.
Back to top
 
 

Decware 34I.3 integrated amp/Forte' 3 bass amp/Velodyne SMS-1 bass mngmnt system/Decware ZOB speakers/Audio Nirvana 8" bass drivers/Xiang Seng DAC/ LR Audio Computer/Rega Apollo R CDP/Emotiva ERC3 CDP/BPT 3.0 power cond.
  IP Logged
Doug
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 274
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #43 - 07/12/23 at 03:36:50
 
Hey CA, most every composer of the last 200 years has written piano music with bass notes in the C1 through C2 octave.  Prior to that, Beethoven, Schubert, and I’m sure others as well, wrote piano pieces with bass notes as low as F1, the lowest note on the piano at that time.  Beethoven’s Appassionata written in F minor is a perfect example.  My brother, Scott,  the owner-operator and main piano instructor at the Kansas City School of Music, just told me that he uses the 1st octave keys virtually every time he plays.  Chopin, Rachmaninoff, Grieg, Brahms, Schumann, Liszt, Debussy, Mendelssohn are a few popular composers that often wrote music using the lowest piano octave.  I think it might be a common misconception that the lowest notes on the piano are seldom used, but I’m not sure why that is.

Here’s an example of the frequent use of the lowest octave throughout an entire piece by Debussy….. and the piece even ends on A0!  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIbqQjQgUPE


Back to top
 
 

Jay’s CD2T-Mk3
Denafrips Pontus II
ZROCK2 25th Mods
CSP3 25th & Custom Mods
PAP Quintets with Voxativ 1.6
First Watt J2 or Cary 300SEI
driving Voxativs—no crossover
LFD NCSE driving 15” Woofers
  IP Logged
Doug
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 274
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #44 - 07/12/23 at 03:46:55
 
Oh no……not a banger!
Back to top
 
 

Jay’s CD2T-Mk3
Denafrips Pontus II
ZROCK2 25th Mods
CSP3 25th & Custom Mods
PAP Quintets with Voxativ 1.6
First Watt J2 or Cary 300SEI
driving Voxativs—no crossover
LFD NCSE driving 15” Woofers
  IP Logged
Kamran
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 949
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #45 - 07/12/23 at 03:48:05
 
LOL 4krow!

Speaking of bass:

I finally broke in a RCA 12AT7 that I recently acquired for the ZR2 and after 50 hrs, it bloomed and provided for the best bass I’ve heard in my rig—tight and with texture (thanks to Will for the rec!).  I have 3 other tubes that bought but going to take my time with the RCA.

My bday recently passed and somehow I convinced my wife that I needed additional room treatment from GIK including stackable floor to ceiling tri traps and 3 cloud panels.  I was convinced that she was going to say no the cloud, but after making a half hearted comment about boxing us in, she relented.  They arrive tomorrow. I’ll most likely setup the tri trap myself and will wait until Thursday when my buddy is available so we can hang up the cloud panels.  I’m hoping that the bass response will be even better with these additional treatments.
Back to top
 
 

Innuos Pulse Streaming Transport and Phoenix Net Switch-Holo Audio Spring 3 KTE DAC-Ic0n4 Autoformer Passive Pre-Sarah 300B SET Amp-ZBIT-GIK Room Treatment-Caintuck Audio Magnum Baffles—Li Audio Fast 15 Drivers-P.I. Audio MajikBuss & Puritan PSM 156 Conditioners
  IP Logged
GroovySauce
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 825
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #46 - 09/28/23 at 13:02:42
 
Quote:
I know your OB subs were based on Rythmik’s direct servo design propagated by GR Research.  The more I read about Direct Servo Subs, the more I thought that on paper, this is a vastly superior design topology. I mean who doesn’t want super clean and controlled bass, which the direct servo design aids? That said, Rythmik subs are not as popular or prevalent (as they should be) compared to say REL or SVS.  I wonder why.

Speaking of direct servo—I was actually thinking of whether it makes sense to get a pair of sealed 12” from Rythmik vs. getting the GR research based OB design.  Both should function very similarly—since they are based on the same design principle.  What made you part with your subs?


They are GR-Research Triple threat OB subs. I say OB subs are the way to go. The same way OB speakers have a lightness and airyness to them the subs offer something similar in an earth shaking way.

OB are not as popular as box speakers, it continues for subs. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Servo control sounds great on paper and in practice. The issue I ran into is I cannot get them to properly blend with my Quintets I even tried a MiniDSP unit to maximize control. I tried all sorts of placements including some more radical placements and couldn't get it to sound right. No matter what I did it slowed down the bass a little bit. The Quintets play to 28hz before rolling off in my room. They still will send subbass rumbles through the concrete slab floor when called for. I opted to keep the subs out of the system.

Kamran, How did the new treatment effect the bass in your room?

I really wish there was a "like" button so many good thought provoking responses. I'm sorry for losing track of this thread! Thank you all for your contributions!

On another thread Palomino posted this track:

Ghost Rider - Makes Us Stronger

All add another too!

Mirage of Deep - A Thousand Nights
Back to top
 
 

Maximus NEO TT|ViV Rigid Float TA | Phasemation PP-200 or Hana ML | Sutherland Little Loco MK2 | Innuos ZENith MK3 | LampizatOr GA TRP | EMIA Remote Autoformer | STL "Super Tube Rectifier" STR-1002 | SRA Cables | PAP Quintet 15 1.6 Voxativ |Torus AVR15
  IP Logged
GroovySauce
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 825
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #47 - 09/28/23 at 13:38:45
 
MantisMash - Chapora Sunrise

Two interesting things about this track.

First, the bass seems to come from a plane at the listening position and then move towards the speakers. Starting about 50seconds in. 40-50 seconds sounds like a ball between the speakers then the second hit is next to the listening position.

Second, This is heading off topic but it's something I think it super cool. Certain songs seem to activate a movie in the mind. This is one of those tracks, a few people have said that it's like being on drugs and interactive, meaning they are watching a movie or in a movie or VR in their mind.

I have found to activate this phenomena the listener needs to have their eyes closed and be in a relaxed state (of course in the sweet spot). Also the volume needs to be at a point where the room is being nicely pressurized. Not crazy loud. peaks of 75-85 has the possibility of activating. A solid bass foundation is the key to this.
Back to top
 
 

Maximus NEO TT|ViV Rigid Float TA | Phasemation PP-200 or Hana ML | Sutherland Little Loco MK2 | Innuos ZENith MK3 | LampizatOr GA TRP | EMIA Remote Autoformer | STL "Super Tube Rectifier" STR-1002 | SRA Cables | PAP Quintet 15 1.6 Voxativ |Torus AVR15
  IP Logged
Palomino
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 2474
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #48 - 09/28/23 at 13:51:33
 
Great thread GS.   I just hopped over from the folded horn thread.  It will take some time to read, think and listen to what's presented here.  I did skim it.  Sorry if any of my points below have already been discussed.

I'm very much into all kinds of bass.   I will definitely check out the Fleetwood Mac track 4K suggested as one of the things I listen to for evaluating my bass playback is bass drums.  I love being able to hear the differences in how the bass drums are stuffed.

My system is tri-amped.  25th covers down to about 200hz,  Crown amp covers down to about 40hz and a plate amp down to 20hz on my 15" sub.

Key to my bass response now are the P10 drivers.  I know they don't play low but they give that upper bass definition in spades.  That's why I suggested that track - because I think the P10s are very dynamic and that track is an example of dynamic, digital bass.

Second are the Acoustic Elegance 15" drivers.  I haven't tried 20 different bass drivers but of the 4 I have tried these are far superior.  Tight, musical, and as far as I can tell, tonally accurate.  For open baffle drivers, they provide a good amount of the pop you can get from box speakers.

The weakness in my bass response is the sub and its wild that I come over to find comments about where I think to go with the open baffle bass.  I may just build Danny's design.  

I blend the three drivers together by listening and measuring.  I measure one driver system at a time and tweak, then add all three together and tweak some more by ear.  Sub bass is the most difficult, but given I am relegating them to the lowest portion of the spectrum, I get them blended OK.

I am pretty pleased with my end result.  I does subtle detail when I want it, accurate timbre and when I'm in the mood, punching room shaking (but not muddy) wall of chest thumping electronic bass.

I'll be listening at the fest to see what the folded horn can do.  I expect definition to be there, but fullness of bass?  Will I miss that sub bass?  I've heard the Lii C10s and S10s in their Lii produced cabinets and while they produced low bass and good volume, but I felt the bass was muddy.

I've commented about this before but Steve has these corner horn bass cabinets connected to a zen amp along with some DM945s (I think).  That combo produced some of the most pleasing bass I've heard.   We did not play punchy bass on them so I can't comment on that but they played low and the soundwave enveloped you and gave your whole body a nice bass buzz.

Soooo, I am getting the best bass of my life, but always feel it can be better.  I think technically, people could have issues with my setup.  Phase issues, timing issues, etc but it sounds good to me.  As I said, the sub is the next frontier.  

Heres an acoustic bass track that I like to test bass with:  Bass Drops, Nenad Vasilic   https://tidal.com/browse/track/114542270
Back to top
 
 

i7 Mac Mini with LPSU/SSD running Audirvana 3.5, Uptone Audio Regen on LPSU, Mytek Brooklyn DAC+, Ven Haus DIY Silver ICs, 25th Ann. Zen, PS Audio P5 Power Supply, PS Audio Power Cords, GR Research Speaker Wire, DIY Big Betsy and Crystal 10 Open Baffle Speakers
  IP Logged
Kamran
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 949
Re: Exploring Bass
Reply #49 - 09/28/23 at 23:01:05
 
So I got the AVC pre and the room treatments installed within a month of each other.  I think it’s one-two punch w.r.t. bass response in my rig, with perhaps the AVC having a bigger impact in terms of bass definition/resolution and the treatments augmenting that further.  The Fast 15 go down to 40Hz flat before they roll off and in my small to medium size room, maybe even lower.

I was (for a while) seriously contemplating getting a pair of Rythmic Servo Subs (and I might still someday) and sell of my SVS PB 2000 Pros, which I only use for HT.  The good thing with Rythmic subs (besides being direct servo) is that they can be independently and simultaneously calibrated for HT and 2-Channel use.  This way, I wouldn’t necessarily be adding more gear in an already crowded room and perhaps even using less space because the SVS subs are bigger in size/heft compared to Rhythmic.  Anyways, I abandoned that idea for now because I am very happy with the bass response in the room post passive pre and treatments and I rather not deal with timing issues either trying to integrate a sub.  Additionally, over time— I am thinking of saving up for PAP Duet’s as a starting point and if they go as as low as spec’d, that would also make the bass better.
Back to top
 
 

Innuos Pulse Streaming Transport and Phoenix Net Switch-Holo Audio Spring 3 KTE DAC-Ic0n4 Autoformer Passive Pre-Sarah 300B SET Amp-ZBIT-GIK Room Treatment-Caintuck Audio Magnum Baffles—Li Audio Fast 15 Drivers-P.I. Audio MajikBuss & Puritan PSM 156 Conditioners
  IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print