bassboy
Ex Member
|
Incidentally the phasing/time delay issue is one of the reasons I like the coffee table idea. Having the sub right in front of you allows more distance to the main speakers, certainly not 5m, but the sub is still closer than the highs. But to tell the truth, the time delay of the WO has never bothered me much, even with the sub farther away than the fronts, as in car audio.
Richard, your post, if I understand correctly is guessing that coupling the two channels is increasing the sensitivity, or overall gain. This may well be the case, but I don't think so. My buddy made a half WO with the full size mouth (triangle shape) and it is very loud and very low. Unfortunately I've never played with it myself at length and have only heard it with unfamiliar music, and in a different vehicle than my WO, but for any given amount of power I don't think his performed any worse than mine.
Even if you are right and the sensitivity is negatively affected, to a certain point I don't care. When I was using my WO as a coffee table I never turned it up very loud because the thing is only a foot away. I am much more concerned about low frequency extention.
According to horn theory, doubling the mouth size, or having 2 mouths in close proximity will increase lfe by significant amounts, I'm not certain that would be the case with horn flares as short as the WO's.
In my wildly optomistic imagination, I can see the double mouth allowing up to half octive extention on the low end. My practical side says it would perform exactly the same as original.
Opinions, thoughts, ideas?
|