Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Decware Audio Forums
10/16/25 at 00:27:20 



Most recent 50 posts

Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Decware and the Carver C-9 (Read 218 times)
mrchipster
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 101
Decware and the Carver C-9
10/09/25 at 18:39:51
 
 I’ve had the pleasure of owning Decware equipment for almost two years now. The previous few years were spent reading and researching what it was I thought I wanted as I transitioned from my solid-state system. I had decided that I wanted to finally explore tube amps and go the way of low power and high speaker efficiency. As you can imagine, there were quite a few options but none as compelling as Decware for me. Being a small family business, made in the USA, reasonably priced, and lifetime warranty/support were among the things that really appealed to me. I knew the wait would be long, but in late 2021 I got on the waiting list and watched my name rise to the top as I know many before me have done. I was able to bide my time by reading the forum, design logs, product manuals, and comments.  It was quite a revelation when in late 2023 I finally heard what many had described throughout this forum. The rich tube goodness, great soundstage, neutrality, and transparency with absolutely no feedback. I very much enjoyed what I heard when I first turned my system on and continue to absolutely love it now that it has been seasoning for some time.

The purpose of this thread is not to go on about the Decware gear since everyone who owns some knows exactly what I’m talking about and how great it is, but it’s to discuss a little bit about how the Carver C-9 sonic hologram generator seems to enhance and complete an already fantastic Decware system(or any relatively high end system for that matter). I was a little apprehensive to add yet another component to the mix as I already had a Zbit, Zrock2, and CSP3 to complement my source(streamer/DAC) and the SE84UFO25. I like to keep things simple but when the right piece is added for the right reasons, it enhances the system as a whole with no loss of transparency or added coloration and so it is with the Carver C-9.

I must give credit to ‘red pill sanctuary’ (aka Paul) for bringing this component to our attention quite a while ago in one of his threads. His very positive and enthusiastic comments about the device really piqued my interest and I wondered if my setup could benefit from the C-9. I figured what the heck, if it made things worse, I could remove it and be back to where I was before. The potential gain seemed truly worth the small risk. RPS (Paul) alerted me to an older model for sale online and I ended up buying it. When it arrived, I immediately unboxed it and the C-9 looked great in appearance. It wasn’t until I removed the cover to take a look that I was shocked. Someone had completely eliminated/bypassed the fuse protection and the soldering job as a result was shabby/inferior to say the least. However, everything else was intact, and all the other parts seemed to be original. I had done some research previously and knew I could get the unit updated/refreshed if need be and I figured I’d go that route eventually, so I wasn’t all that concerned. I wanted to know if the unit actually worked but not before putting it through some tests before hooking it up. With the cover off I plugged it in to see what would happen. The red power light came on, and a good sign was that there was no smoke, no buzz, no weird happenings. I left it like that for quite a while and eventually unplugged it for the night. I did the same thing the following day, just plugged it in while I worked and kept an eye on it. I finally got the confidence to insert the C-9 into an older backup stereo system and there was no issue. The time came to insert it into the Decware setup between the CSP3 and the UFO25. I slowly powered things up all the while keeping a close eye on everything. There were no issues, so I just let the equipment sit powered on for a while. The C-9 was cool to the touch (which I would expect) and all other components were doing just fine. Now came the moment of truth, would it sound good? (I mean how could it, the way the soldering and wires looked, not to mention how old the rest of it was) but I wasn’t prepared for the new sound coming out of my speakers. I was speechless for a minute and couldn’t believe what I was hearing. The C-9 was enhancing an already great Decware sound and definitely bringing something more to the table.

I’d like to continue in the near future by showing some pics of my setup/room and describe in more detail how the C-9 is being used in my situation, how the sound was enhanced and what I’ve had done to it.
Back to top
 
 

SE84UFO25 - CSP3 (A-mods)
ZROCK2 (A-mods) - ZBIT
Cambridge Audio CXN V2 (ModWright)
Cambridge Audio CXC
Zu Audio Soul Supremes
VIABLUE IC's & Spkr cables ; DSR3 IC's
Audio-Technica TT
  IP Logged
CAJames
Seasoned Member
****


"I've run every
red light on memory
lane."

Posts: 2832
Re: Decware and the Carver C-9
Reply #1 - 10/09/25 at 20:19:29
 
That's very interesting. Back in the 80s, when I was first getting into "high end" audio, the C-9 was new and Bob Carver was doing everything he could to piss off Stereophile, my audio buddy had a C-9. My recollection is that on 3 records it was amazing. On everything else it (at best) made recordings sound different, but mostly just made stuff sound funny. And for those 3 records you had to have your ears within a millimeter of the exact sweet spot or the magic disappeared.

Of course back then our systems were pretty pedestrian compared to my/our current Decware rigs, and what passed for stereo imaging was not much more than being able to hear the different between the left and right channel. The idea of a detailed, layered and transparent sound stage would have been crazy talk. I wonder if the Sonic Hologram was just way ahead of its time, or actually needed something like a low(er) power Decware system rather than the mega-amps with huge speakers Carver sold?

Looking forward to future installments.


Back to top
 
 

[FOOBAR2000 | Jay's CDT2 MRK3] -> Denafrips Terminator 2 + Gaia
Sumiko Pearwood -> Mapleknoll Athena -> Luxman SUT -> Mapletree Phono 3E
STR-1002 -> Woo WA22 -> 2x UFO25s, balanced monos
Omega SAM , Hifiman Arya, Audeze LCD-XC
  IP Logged
Tony
Seasoned Member
****


"Life
without...music is
inconceivable"
A.Einsteln

Posts: 809
Re: Decware and the Carver C-9
Reply #2 - 10/09/25 at 22:19:09
 

I got a C-9 unit about 6 months ago. Rebuilt by 4krow, who often contributes to the Forum, I took a risk and put it in my system. As it has worked out, it is one of the best audio investments I have made in the past 5 years. Some tracks with the C-9, like those featuring a female vocalist, don't sound as good as without it. I simply turn it off when that's the issue with a push of a button.

I'm glad to hear that someone else likes their C-9 as much as I do.
Back to top
 
 

SEWE300B | STR-1002 | Ic0n4 | Lumin U2 Mini| Denafrips Terminator DAC | Denafrips Gaia DDC | Verafi LNBH and SSZ & SDFB-Graphene Slugs | Decware I/Cs | Decware Pwr Cbls | ZWIRE Speaker Cbls | Omega SAHOM & KEF KC62 | Furman Cond l GIK Room Trmt
  IP Logged
mrchipster
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 101
Re: Decware and the Carver C-9
Reply #3 - 10/14/25 at 21:35:05
 
The room my stereo equipment is in is probably a fairly common size for people who can dedicate a space for listening. I wish I had a larger space and maybe one day I will, but for now I have to work with a 12’x14’ with a 10-foot ceiling. The space is not ideal since I have a credenza between the speakers which I have my equipment on. The speakers are on the long wall, which in normal circumstances may not be the best but in my situation, it seems to work well since the speakers have more distance to the side walls and still gives me a little more than an 8’ triangle for my listening.  I spent almost a year trying different speaker positions and toe-in and finally settled on what I have now. The sound I was getting was about as good as the Decware system and the room would allow. Over that time, I was also adding a significant amount of room treatments. I’ve spent a great deal of time listening in this environment and had a very good feel for the Decware sound and how the room allowed it to shine. The sound was very neutral, clear, and had good imaging as well as a nice soundstage with a solid phantom center channel. What I wasn’t getting was a lot of depth, that front to back depth I hear so much about. Fortunately, I was getting some depth and a good amount of layering, so I was happy. I think the credenza and the room as a whole is limiting me to some extent.

Just a few pics of my room:









The C-9 is usually behind the credenza door but I pulled it out for the pic.




It had been quite a while since I had read anything about the C-9 and when Paul (red pill sanctuary) brought it up in his posts I started to research it again. It was definitely a cool and interesting piece of gear, but as CAJames mentioned in his post, I was wondering if the unique characteristic of the unit and my not-so-great room would be able to do justice to the C-9. You see, the C-9 is meant to be used in a very specific way. The instructions point out that it should be used exactly as described if you want to extract the most 3D holographic imaging that it’s capable of. It requires as exact a speaker placement as you can get based on the guidelines it spells out. I knew I had the right equipment to springboard from (the great Decware system) but the limitations in my room would be a problem. I really had very little wiggle room for changing speaker placement and the directions said the speakers should be roughly 5’ apart. (maybe even closer). That meant I would need to position the speakers in front of the credenza, which I knew I would probably not be doing (except to experiment with maybe). I went back and forth but ultimately decided to get one. At the time you could pick one up for $100 - $200. I paid $175, on the high side but in retrospect it was a good enough deal. As I mentioned earlier, even with the issues the unit had, once inserted into the audio chain, it just enhanced the sound from the get-go. Knowing what it could do at this point I decided to do what Tony mentioned in his post. I contacted 4krow (aka Greg) and asked if he would refresh the unit. He agreed and did a fantastic job, and I thank him for that. I now have peace of mind knowing there is fuse protection and all the updates and upgrades will carry me well into the future. For less than $400 total, I have a piece of equipment that perfectly complements and enhances my Decware system.

C-9 BEFORE :



C-9 AFTER Greg performed his magic. Outstanding!




After more play, the C-9 alleviated my uncertainty. To CAJames’ point, I thought maybe it would sound weird or somehow ‘off’, or maybe no difference at all. The C-9 didn’t ‘add’ anything, in fact, it seemed to subtract something. That something is crosstalk. When both ears hear an instrument or voice from both speakers, precise imaging seems to be affected. So, when an instrument, voice, or backup vocals are supposed to come from the left or right position in the soundstage, the sound from the opposite speaker can detract from the imaging in the soundstage. The C-9 seems to be able to eliminate/reduce the crosstalk by removing the unwanted signal to the opposite speaker when it needs to, thus eliminating the opposite speakers’ influence on the position of that sound. I have no idea how it actually works though (my technical experience is zilch on this). The kicker is it does this without altering the tone, neutrality, or base sound you’ve come to expect from your system. The result is precise imaging within the soundstage. The other important fact is that it gives depth to each instrument or voice. It seems that each instrument has a 360-degree radius of sound that emanates from its precise location as you’d expect from a live performance. The C-9 seems to not only give each instrument its own depth, but it also pulls the entire soundstage together into one cohesive soundscape. The speakers seem to disappear more easily, the left to right soundstage widens a bit and the air and separation of instruments and voices, along with the overall cohesiveness, just draws you in. I found myself wanting to leave it on at all times for all tracks. There is a much higher level of emotional engagement with the C-9 on as opposed to off. That is where it’s at for me.

I don’t know why I’m able to achieve this level of enjoyment with the C-9 since by all accounts I shouldn’t be able to. I have done nothing to my original setup and when I tried to adhere to the user guide instructions on proper speaker placement/etc. I couldn’t achieve anything near the results I got with my original setup. (not to mention the ridiculous look of having the speakers in front of the credenza). One day when I have a different room I will certainly try again, but for now I’m leaving it as is. I’m not getting a true holographic image with this setup but to be honest, I’m getting what seems to be a true to life image/soundscape in front of me as you would in a small venue with the performers spread out in front of you. I know the room treatments help a great deal and getting your setup/speaker placement to your liking with your Decware (or other high end) gear before inserting the C-9 is critical as well. From there, I think anyone with a conventional setup can still benefit from the C-9.

Another topic I’d like to talk about will be the different recording formats that Paul (RPS) has sent me on various CD’s. Paul was kind and generous enough to send me over 30 CD’s with some great music on them that he had created to help me evaluate the Carver C-9. I hope to follow up shortly. Thanks for hanging with me so far.
Back to top
 
 

SE84UFO25 - CSP3 (A-mods)
ZROCK2 (A-mods) - ZBIT
Cambridge Audio CXN V2 (ModWright)
Cambridge Audio CXC
Zu Audio Soul Supremes
VIABLUE IC's & Spkr cables ; DSR3 IC's
Audio-Technica TT
  IP Logged
MM
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 343
Re: Decware and the Carver C-9
Reply #4 - Yesterday at 17:18:11
 
That’s a great looking setup, Chipster. Quadratic residue diffusers (QRD) would help with that image depth you are looking for.

I’ve had some really good sounding systems over the years set up on the long wall. Long wall is actually my preference although it isn’t feasible in my current space. I have found QRD diffusion on the front and back walls with absorption on the side walls most effective, assuming you have enough space between your listing position and the diffusers for them to do their thing. Typically 8 ft is a generous and sufficient amount.
Back to top
 
 

Cambridge CXN100, DSR3 Interconnects, SEWE 300b, ZSTYX SC, Lii F15 & W15 in open baffle.
  IP Logged
mrchipster
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 101
Re: Decware and the Carver C-9
Reply #5 - Yesterday at 21:31:50
 
Thanks MM, it took a couple of years+ to get to this point with my system and room treatment.

You make a good point about the QRD diffusers. I hope to add them at some point, but I don't think I'll be able to until I change rooms. Those absorbers just have a 'scatter plate' attached to the front and are a poor attempt at mimicking some diffusion along with absorption. I've heard the QRDs do a great job, and I hope to incorporate them down the line. I do have absorbers at the first reflection points as well as rear bass traps and absorbers at the back wall (not shown in any of the pics). These room treatments are nothing like GroovySauce or red pill sanctuary have, (and others) but surprisingly they make a big enough difference. Groovy and RPS have some awesome treatments, and I hope I can come close to something like that in the future. I'm sure enjoying the sound in this smallish room. (the Decware equipment makes sure of that!)

Thanks for your recommendations, appreciate it.
Back to top
 
 

SE84UFO25 - CSP3 (A-mods)
ZROCK2 (A-mods) - ZBIT
Cambridge Audio CXN V2 (ModWright)
Cambridge Audio CXC
Zu Audio Soul Supremes
VIABLUE IC's & Spkr cables ; DSR3 IC's
Audio-Technica TT
  IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print