MrDerrick
Seasoned Member
  

May The Source Be With You!
Posts: 180
|
My first 30 Days with the KTE May
Design aspects that attracted me to the May;
1. Supposedly superior USB implementation 2. NOS mode of operation 3. MHz PCM compatibility 4. Separate isolated power supply chassis 5. No touch screen for local operation 6. Apparent build quality 7. No MQA
I have had the KTE May in possession for 30 days now. The May was purchased second hand, 5 months old with roughly 1000 hours. I cannot confirm whether the May had 1000 hours of playing time on it, but I logged another 750 hours and I think that it is now fully settled in. Gathered from others experiences, it appears that the May needs around 1500 hours to fully settle in.
For myself, I had specific goals that I was trying to achieve with the May, some were met and some have yet to be realized.
So, all of my listening and related findings are based upon the following;
1. The need to eliminate the need for any form of D>D converter between the renderer and DAC 2. All source material, SDM & PCM from SSD or streamed PCM was played through HQPlayer 3. The sample rate and bit rate into the May for all source material was 705.6/768 20 4. Since the recent release of HQPlayer Embedded 4.23.0, all impressions are based on LNS15 dither and the new sinc-Mx filter 5. Display turned off and PLL defeated, why use it if you do not need it 6. NOS mode enabled
I have spent countless hours of musical rediscovery with the May. The KTE May is an extremely quiet DAC, I am able to hear further into the music more than I have ever been before. SDM files converted to PCM retain all of their silence, but some PCM files noise floors have become very apparent. The May has excellent bottom end drive and overall extension that will have you smiling and your toes tapping. Sound stage width, depth, separation and 3D placement are exceptional. The level of musical liquidity that I am now experiencing is as close to analog as I have ever heard through my system.
Characteristics of the KTE May that I like best;
1. The USB input is the most well designed and implemented that I have ever heard. This was number 1 one my list of wants. Straight USB from renderer to DAC, no extra D>D converters in the signal path 2. NOS mode 3. No perceived need to implement the PLL to reduce jitter on the USB input. If it is not needed, I am happy that I can defeat it. Lock times are instantaneous 4. This is some serious build quality 5. No aftermarket footers needed; Still Points Ultra SS footers made no difference 6. The music just flows from this DAC, it places me in a meditative musical coma
There are some personal nit-picky things though that I will suffer with;
1. Why no copper fox badge on the power supply 2. Why no little rubber nubs on the bottom of the remote ( ugh, the sound of metal on metal ) 3. If anybody touches the surface of the May you will know, there will be fingerprints 4. While the USB input is phenomenal sounding, it has its quirks, let’s just say that the “U” in USB does not necessarily mean universal when it comes to MHz PCM 5. My power sucks, even though I have a PS Audio PW PP3 regenerator, with 3 of my neighbors connected to my utility transformer secondary and having solar panels, their inverters raise my THD high enough that the PP3 can’t clean things up enough for the May power supply. At its worst, I can hear a slight electrical tizz coming from the power supply during the day. When the sun goes down this tizz disappears
One of the intentions for transitioning to the May was to be able to experience MHz PCM files. This is apparently a hit or miss with regards to different USB design protocols? You do have to roll the firmware in the May for MHz PCM to FW 3012 from 3014. The chatter is that your USB device that is being connected to the May has to have “Intel” inside, even then it may or may not work.
Putting the MHz PCM issues aside, I am very elated with the KTE May.
Next goal, try PGGB from remastero.com to lower the noise floor of those PCM files!
|