Hi LS,
I'm happy my experience w/ the power tubes triggered the idea for you to put the el34's in in the IV. I can see why the thought didn't occur to you for so long. Most everything written here about the Mark IV is with the 66's in place.
I wouldn't be surprised to see someday you writing about putting the 66's back in though. I actually have them back in my III. And soon, I'll probably rotate the 77's in for awhile. It seems they all have their strengths and I think I'll be enjoying revisiting them all from time to time. 77's for the awesome bass, 34's for the mid's and the 66's for the detail and other well documented strengths. The first time I listened to a piano's decay via the 66's was certainly a jaw dropping moment. Some day I may spring for those Psvane el34's you mentioned in the other thread. Lotta money, but if they are that much better than my tung-sols, it'll be worth it.
Lon, you are absolutely correct about us all having valid but different opinions on what tube set work best based on our differing gear,environments etc. No doubt about it.
The reality check that keeps me from going overboard with all this nirvana searching is the reactions I see from my wife or friends when I put on a cool "stereo" kind of song like Fleetwood Mac's Rhiannon. The talking seems to stop and they just sit in amazement at the sound. Doesn't seem to matter which tube combinations I'm running either.

Makes me realize it's all good and there is no right or wrong, and also, for me, no set in stone tube combination.
What tube set I run is now just going to be a mood thing.
Greg
(btw, I know for most folks that read this, what I say is no revelation. It's just some rambling of a first year tube nube figuring some things out for the first time. It's been a really great year.)