will
|
Hey Karl. Most of my observations, and assumptions based on them, start from what I perceive from the music, and how that sounds to me. I have always been inclined to follow my perception more than measurements or theory. And to refine those senses and discernement, I have avoided a lot of the, to me limited, though often useful, measurement data and conventional theory, that if taken too seriously, too easily results in absolutist "facts" that do not make sense based on all the complexities we hear.
This does not mean I don't think these tools are not real or useful, in fact right now, I wish I had a scope so that I could measure the power coming out of the tubes we are running VRs to. It is more that I have spent years tuning into changes made, early on with modifying instruments, then system room refinements, and later making more and more cables and doing lots of modification work. There is no doubt for me that progressive practice with mainly the "listening experience" as guide, has honed my perception and discernment, making analysis of the influences from different wires, caps, connectors, resistors, designs, settings... more articulate, including discerning what I hear from the whole with refinements. The other side, measurements in our culture can become a crutch that can limit our perception and discernment... Probably a different fine line for all of us, but also, measurements we have so far simply cannot differentiate much of this vast complex of balances that make our audio experience more or less real.
Still, I really like to find catalysts like this discussion that can cause me to want to read up on the the established views of causes and effects, seeking research information in context making it easier to approach for me.
I started to describe how cathode, grid and plate interact, but then decided to see what the Brave Browser search's AI would say, which is not perfect, but so far very impressive at grabbing info from numerous articles (or whatever) that relate to the question, and answering it in a consolidated way based on the question.
But first, in my experience the voltage going into the amp is notably influential on the the sound, more voltage in, a more powerful and concentrated/dense signal, and less, a more open and complex signal ..not just alike, but not dissimilar from what we hear from changing VRs.
The natural assumption, adjusting voltages to the amp, adjusts voltages in the amp, changing the sound with these revealing tube designs. This led me to a PSAudio P5 regenerator.
I can't find the receipt but maybe 2009 or so, with my new Torii MKIII, I was having difficulty tuning my system as precisely as I wanted, and finally figured out that this was because the system was always changing sound, from more open and leaner to more consolidated and full. Measuring the voltage as this happened, the power at the receptacle changed, a revelation for me. Though not really very noisy power here (then) the voltage measurement varied over time from something like 119 to 123, and mostly stayed on the higher side. On Steve's suggestion, I put a variac in front of my Audio Brickwall distribution box that fed the amp, and this was interesting, corroborating what I thought I was hearing from increasing and reducing voltage. I preferred it set much lower, opening and relaxing the intensity of all that made the sound... But I did not like the loss of transparency with the variac in the power chain, and did not like how the house voltage still shifted, even though it was manually controllable by the variac at any given time.
So I got a demo PSAudio P5 and found it had transparency issues for me in this system too, but less, and it had voltage regulation. I found then that I preferred maybe 117 or so as I recall, 6 volts less than the peak voltage before, not weakening, but making all aspects of the sound less forced.
First I made a cable for it that I tuned specifically to open, speed up, and clean the sound of the P5 as it related to all beyond. Later, I soldered some connections replacing slip on connecters inside and put in some more transparent receptacles. Then I discovered how phase adjustments on the P5 could alter the density and spaciousness of the sound, and started to really like it. It is still not quite as transparent as my other lightly filtered distributors, but pretty good, and it has other benefits that outweigh.
I check it every so often, but now, many years later, I still end up at 117 and -5 to -7 on the phase. Here, lower phase adjustments reveal more fine detail in space, effecting everything, but easily read by decays, spaciousness, textures...
The other tool I really like, I use because of the way I use Swiss Digital Fuse Boxes (SDFB). If not familiar, they replace fuses by sensing problem like fuses would blow for, but electronically disengaging, in my case allowing hollow silver, and silver/rhodium fuse shaped tubes in the place of fuses. The silver tubes offer more powerful, faster, cleaner, and resolving sound than pretty nice fuses I had...Though most like solid "sluggos," I like the hollows. Similarly to turning up the P5 voltage before modifications, solid "sluggos" of similar quality metal make the sound too forceful and intense for my setup, where the signal unfolds very quickly and easily. Presumably, it is the lower mass of metal with the hollows that put me between fuses and solids, the sound strong, dynamic, and clean, but not overwhelming to me.
Anyway, rather than one SDFB to each piece of gear I am pushing it, using a 5 amp SDFB for my P5, and amp... and one 3 amp SDFB for my DAC, ZRock, Zstage, and CSP3. Leading me to a benefit of the P5 regenerator. You can set up delays for turning on its different receptacles. I have mine set so the P5 comes on first alone, then maybe 10 seconds later, the four front end/pre stages come on, and maybe 15 seconds later, the amp comes on, in theory making the inrush less on the gear, and through the SDFBs.
But back to tubes, below is what I copied from the browser search about grid voltage, and the links below that are presumably what the AI referenced. Pretty new to me, I often reference some of the top articles to corroborate the accuracy. Though general, this sounded pretty real to me. Steve's design choices with series wired VRs and cathode biasing are bound to have some effect, but based on what we hear with VR changes, it is obvious they are changing the tubes that follow, and though this does not go into subtler detail of cause and effect like Steve might, I think it at least basically explains what is happening from changing the grid voltage with VRs:
"does the grid voltage alter the bias of the tubes and what are the effects on tube power"
Grid Voltage and Tube Bias Effects
Yes, the grid voltage directly alters the bias of a vacuum tube, and this change has significant effects on the tube's power output and operation.
The bias of a tube is fundamentally determined by the voltage difference between the control grid and the cathode. A negative grid voltage relative to the cathode is applied to set the operating point, preventing excessive current flow and ensuring the tube operates within its linear range. When the instantaneous grid voltage (the sum of the DC bias and the AC input signal) becomes less negative or even positive relative to the cathode, the tube conducts more current, effectively making the bias "hotter". Conversely, a more negative grid voltage reduces the current, making the bias "colder". This relationship is highly sensitive; a small change in grid voltage can cause a large change in plate current due to the tube's inherent characteristics.
The effect of altering the grid voltage on tube power is direct and critical. As the grid voltage becomes less negative (or more positive), the plate current increases, leading to higher power dissipation in the tube and a corresponding increase in output power. However, if the grid voltage becomes positive with respect to the cathode, the tube draws grid current, which can lead to excessive power dissipation in the grid itself, potentially causing damage or mechanical distortion due to overheating. The maximum power output is limited by the tube's ability to dissipate heat, which depends on its cooling method. In power amplifier stages, particularly in push-pull configurations, accurate matching of tubes and precise adjustment of the control grid bias voltage are essential to ensure both tubes amplify equally and prevent performance issues like distortion. The bias setting also influences the sound; for example, a higher grid bias (colder) can make an amplifier sound more open but with a "sizzly" high end, while a lower bias (hotter) can produce a warmer, more compressed tone.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts. 🌐 tdpri.com What are the operating limits on the grid to cathode relationship? | Telecaster Guitar Forum 🌐 aikenamps.com What Is Biasing? 🌐 amfone.net Grid Bias 🌐 john-a-harper.com Tubes 201 - How Vacuum Tubes Really Work 🌐 hans-egebo.dk Vacuum tube biasing methods 🌐 tubes.njunis.net Grid current, why does it occur? – tubes 🌐 reddit.com r/AskElectronics on Reddit: Vacuum tubes - why don't electrons "go down" the positive grid? 🌐 sciencedirect.com Grid Bias - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics 🌐 sweetwater.com What Is Tube Amp Biasing? How It Works, Why You Should Care - InSync | Sweetwater 🌐 oestex.com Tubes 🌐 tubes.njunis.net Grid Leak Bias or Contact Potential Bias. – tubes 🌐 forum.fractalaudio.com Power Tube Grid Bias | Fractal Aud
|