will
|
shold,
I think the HR-1s would likely liven up very nicely either way. Mine sound really good at lower volumes, especially with the CSP3 pushing a bit more than at higher volumes, but for a really deep listening, the HR-1s come alive with power. I mean 92 dB is more efficient than many, but not terribly efficient compared to many other speakers today. I think they are at their best with more power.
I have had a SE 34 and a Rachel here, and they sound great, but nothing like a Torii...Toriis sound powerful...And unfortunately, I have never heard two Rachels. I suspect two together would sound greater than the sum though. But the Torii, I suspect it is a different thing.
I think it is part the design and part the power, but Toriis really can grab the HR-1s and bring out qualities that make it all music rather than speakers. Two Rachels might well do this too.
Another consideration.....the Torii has much more adjustment power if you are into that. Changing any of the five tube types can be easily heard, and are great tools for fine tuning the sound to tastes and room. Also, the Torii's adjustments (at least the MKIII and MKIV) for impedance, bass, and treble are really useful. The potential caveat for a Torii, at least if your room has bass issues, is that the Torii has great bass potential. This can be good or bad depending on circumstances of system, room, speaker placement flexibility (or lack thereof) and so on. I have a feeling two Rachels would be less bassy, again, good or bad depending on circumstances.
But I am just brainstorming not having tried two Rachels....after everyone has chimed in, don't forget that Steve is a great resource in these decisions and a phone call away!
|