Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Decware Audio Forums
12/15/17 at 12:22:40 





 



Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
SE84UFO3 vs SE34I.5 (Read 1431 times)
pursuitofnow
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 163
SE84UFO3 vs SE34I.5
04/25/17 at 19:18:56
 
Wondering if anyone has thoughts or could explain the sound differences between these two amps. Seem similar power wise. Is it mainly the voltage regulation?
Back to top
 
 

Thorens VN-150
2M Bronze
ZP3
ZSTAGE
_______

Moon 230HAD
ZROCK
_______

SE84UFO
ZSTYX
Dayton PS220-8
DeepOmega 8
  IP Logged
Rivieraranch
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 1438
Re: SE84UFO3 vs SE34I.5
Reply #1 - 04/26/17 at 05:31:48
 
You are basically asking for a comparisone between the Zen Monoblocks and the Rachel. I had a Rachel and didn't like it. The amp was too smooth and mellow. Its gain characteristics were such that it began clipping at higher volumes. The Zen I had on the other hand was nice and lively, never clipped and gave that wonderful Zen presentation. The voltage regulation on the monoblocks is very worthwhile. I would go with the Blocks. With 4ohm speakers the Zen will play louder than Rachel. She is more compatible with 8ohm speakers. With 4ohm speakers  she only puts out around 3 watts. Also the Blocks will give you a great sense of stereo separation. I first experienced this with my dual mono Mini Tori.
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: 04/26/17 at 05:37:57 by Rivieraranch »  

TORII MK IV; ZSTAGE; HR-1 SPEAKERS; TECHNICS SL1200MK5 KAB MODDED TT; AH! NJOE TJOEB CDP; MARANTZ 2226B; SENNHEISER HD-580 headphones
55   IP Logged
jorgen
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 195
Re: SE84UFO3 vs SE34I.5
Reply #2 - 04/26/17 at 12:10:09
 
I'm sorry I can't compare and there are few who have these new mono blocks. They might be pretty similar to the earlier model,  but still a significant difference. I haven't heard the Rachel.

You can't go wrong with the MBs (probably not with Rachel either I guess) but these amps are very exciting
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Rivieraranch
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 1438
Re: SE84UFO3 vs SE34I.5
Reply #3 - 04/26/17 at 20:49:40
 
Since you already have a Zen amp, the blocks are the ultimate refinement of that design. You will experience darker backgrounds on account of the voltage regulation and better stereo separation. You may be able to use shorter speaker wires. The blocks end up with a bit more power than the stereo Zen amp. You would have to decide which bias you want the input to have as the Blocks don't have a bias switch as the stereo Zen amp.  
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: 04/26/17 at 20:50:31 by Rivieraranch »  

TORII MK IV; ZSTAGE; HR-1 SPEAKERS; TECHNICS SL1200MK5 KAB MODDED TT; AH! NJOE TJOEB CDP; MARANTZ 2226B; SENNHEISER HD-580 headphones
55   IP Logged
Lin
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 295
Re: SE84UFO3 vs SE34I.5
Reply #4 - 04/26/17 at 22:42:46
 
The mono amps are 2.7w and Rachael is 5.8w, hard to say if it will make a difference in your system.
I think the output of amps with UFO transformers is the same at 4 and 8 ohms, if switched to match the speakers.

$2400/pair vs. $1500
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: 04/26/17 at 22:43:35 by Lin »  
  IP Logged
Rivieraranch
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 1438
Re: SE84UFO3 vs SE34I.5
Reply #5 - 04/26/17 at 23:52:11
 
The UFO transformers changed the game regarding output. I was thinking of how they were before the impedance switch and UFO transformers. With efficient speakers either amp will get loud enough. However the Zen platform and the Rachel platform are very different. I've owned both so I can attest. The question is whether Rachel is "different" as in better, or just different is a personal call.
Back to top
 
 

TORII MK IV; ZSTAGE; HR-1 SPEAKERS; TECHNICS SL1200MK5 KAB MODDED TT; AH! NJOE TJOEB CDP; MARANTZ 2226B; SENNHEISER HD-580 headphones
55   IP Logged
jorgen
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 195
Re: SE84UFO3 vs SE34I.5
Reply #6 - 04/27/17 at 13:50:44
 
Bias switch can be added for the mono amps for 150$. Glad i added that option
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Rivieraranch
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 1438
Re: SE84UFO3 vs SE34I.5
Reply #7 - 04/27/17 at 18:12:21
 
I personally preferred the hot setting on my Zen so I would order mine biased hot, not the switch.
Back to top
 
 

TORII MK IV; ZSTAGE; HR-1 SPEAKERS; TECHNICS SL1200MK5 KAB MODDED TT; AH! NJOE TJOEB CDP; MARANTZ 2226B; SENNHEISER HD-580 headphones
55   IP Logged
Lon
Seasoned Member
****


"Love without
guts is
worthless!"
Philip K. D*ck

Posts: 13014
Re: SE84UFO3 vs SE34I.5
Reply #8 - 04/27/17 at 18:39:12
 
Yes, we're all different. I've always preferred the laid back position on any Decware amp, but it's nice to have both options really as rooms and surrounding components can change. And it can help resale.
Back to top
 
 

HR-1,ZP3,ZTPRE,Torii MkIII,ZBIT,ZROCK2,Taboo MkIV;PS Audio:Soloist SE,DMP+DSD,P10,PowerBases,AC-12 pcs,Mapleshade:Dbl Helix+,SamsonV2+V3;CambrAudi CXU;Rega RP3,TTPSU,Groovetracer upgrades,Exact2;VooDoo Cremona +Amati,Iso-Pods;MD90-T SE tuner,Oppo PM-1,Audeze LCD-2
  IP Logged
pursuitofnow
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 163
Re: SE84UFO3 vs SE34I.5
Reply #9 - 05/07/17 at 18:10:47
 
I have compared my SE84UFO (with copper foil caps) to a friends Rachael (non jupiter caps) and I prefer my amp. The speakers are very efficient at 98db, and I feel the zen suits my listening preferences more. The Rachael seemed masked or veiled in comparison. At least to my ears.

Sounds like there wouldn't be much of a volume difference between the mono block version and my amp. I'm not even sure I need more volume, though I'm curious, I don't want to give up the characteristics the zen gives me. It is an amazing amp. I was thinking the mono blocks would give a little more volume.
Back to top
 
 

Thorens VN-150
2M Bronze
ZP3
ZSTAGE
_______

Moon 230HAD
ZROCK
_______

SE84UFO
ZSTYX
Dayton PS220-8
DeepOmega 8
  IP Logged
Rivieraranch
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 1438
Re: SE84UFO3 vs SE34I.5
Reply #10 - 05/07/17 at 18:48:29
 
You order those monoblocks, Boy! Now you hear for yourself the Rachel and how laid back it is. Zen is where it is at!
Back to top
 
 

TORII MK IV; ZSTAGE; HR-1 SPEAKERS; TECHNICS SL1200MK5 KAB MODDED TT; AH! NJOE TJOEB CDP; MARANTZ 2226B; SENNHEISER HD-580 headphones
55   IP Logged
FullRangeMan
Verified Member
**




Posts: 19
Re: SE84UFO3 vs SE34I.5
Reply #11 - 05/09/17 at 13:16:51
 
Hi all,
Do the power transformer from these amps have the same core weight?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
DBC
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 415
Re: SE84UFO3 vs SE34I.5
Reply #12 - 05/09/17 at 17:28:58
 
FullRangeMan,

Saw a couple of your posts suggesting possible concern for the UFO transformers. I have a 15 year old Zen Select and a 1 year old Zen UFO. I leave my UFO "ON" for days / weeks at a time, no issues. In my opinion the UFO sounds a bit louder compared to the Select. This may be due to the added clarity of the UFO?

Recently Palomino, Lonely Raven and I listened to Pal's Rachael and LR's UFO in Pal's room. I thought the UFO played a bit louder despite the published power differential.

Some of the difference may be that the Rachael requires a 2.5 volt input source to come up to full power where the UFO only requires a 2.0 volt input to reach full output power?

It would be natural to assume a 6 watt amp will play noticeably louder than a 2 watt amp. I don't think this is necessarily the case when comparing these two amps back to back.



Back to top
 
 

Main System: Oppo BDP-105D, SE84UFO amp, Omega Super Alnico Monitors, Twin Custom SLAB 15's (Low Frequency Open Baffle).
DBC   IP Logged
Rivieraranch
Seasoned Member
****




Posts: 1438
Re: SE84UFO3 vs SE34I.5
Reply #13 - 05/10/17 at 03:02:42
 
You are right because the Rachel will clip before it reaches full volume whereas the Zen will not.
Back to top
 
 

TORII MK IV; ZSTAGE; HR-1 SPEAKERS; TECHNICS SL1200MK5 KAB MODDED TT; AH! NJOE TJOEB CDP; MARANTZ 2226B; SENNHEISER HD-580 headphones
55   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print