Fireblade
Seasoned Member
  

Knowledge comes, but wisdom lingers. A.L.Tennyson
Posts: 628
|
Hi stone, thanks for sharing your experiences. I get it that among LE84 pentodes, there are competing sound differences between SEP and PP configurations, in class A, and that your true fidelity reference setup is a beam tube SEP wired as a triode (i.e., SE84C+).
This has made you consider the .3 as an interesting alternative, due to its natural Triode tube (EL34) and the SET configuration, class A, assuming of course all the other elements in the chain are up to the task.
If I understood you correctly, this confirms my initial hesitation. I would like to have the fidelity (transparency, liquidity, air, soundstage, etc.) of a Triode SET, without the possible weaknesses involved, if any. Nevertheless, I know the Mini is a pentode (6V6) tube SEP wired up as a Triode and a class A (almost no feedback) amp, sharing much of those characteristics, with some tradeoffs already discussed earlier.
It would be interesting to hear your evaluation of the new integrated, compared with your current SE84C+ reference setup. I suspect the Hazen Mod plus the more linear behavior of the natural Triode would bring up some sound differences. Specifically, I would assume differences in the frequency extremes relative to the midrange and some pleasant harmonics being added.
In the end, I think having the weakest link of the total setup up to par is far more important than slight differences in these design choices, assuming they have been correctly designed and built.
Please correct me if I've come to the wrong conclusions. Thanks again ...
|