erik2a3
|
Fireblade - i know, it always seems there's a compromise some place, doesn't it? As Florida Boy mentioned, there is not (necessarily) a need for another pair of IC. I've used these several times over the years, and my dad is not using the 12dB attenuatora I sent him to use with a Dynaco ST70 amp I rebuilt and gave him. His speakers are also very efficient, probably in the range of Raduscha's. He had hair trigger volume pots, too, and these attenuators solved the issue, leaving the controls still just a bit sensitive but much less so. What is good is that, at least to me, did nothing in terms of degradation of HF response or anything else. They just knocked the level down. I used them straight into the back of my amps, but the Mini Torii's inputs are of course on the top. This might be a visual or aesthetic concern that Raduscha won't want. The attenuators aren't that long though. There is a more high end company that also sells these, but I can't recall their name off hand. Regarding the math of this: Iused to have it on the tip of my tongue when I was using them before, but I just can't remember. What's just easier is to just get a a couple of values and try them. On the IC, thing, though, if one were to build a buffer or line stage for this, another pair of ICs would be mandatory, not to mention the extra circuitry, power supply (hum can be a problem with high efficiency, crossoverless drivers), another power cord, etc. these attenuatorsmare the first thing I mentioned. They actually really work quite well, at least in my experience, and like you guys I'm picky about this sort of stuff too.
|