It is of high probability that the outcome will generally be less than satisfactory. The best of digital source units will be of higher acceptance toward compatibility. However, mutual compliance with these speakers will always be superior with a premium analog source. The level of outcome will always be relative to the level of input.
The other key element resides within the accuracy of matching parameters within the equipment in use with the speakers. As I have made clear, these models are too revealing and unforgiving for any condition less than optimal, as any abnormalities will definitely stand out with these speakers or any other design for that matter which conforms to this pinnacle of quality.
Going back and reviewing my process,
can you be certain that anyone else has duplicated my set exactly as shown in my process? I emphasized very strongly the importance of the seemingly small details that most people tend to overlook or disregard as non-essential to the outcome. That difference in detail is what sets apart any design standard from mediocre to within reach of the highest echelon of quality.
To sum this up in undeniable conclusion, I do not have a problem with the results in my system/room configuration, nor does the designer in his. There is a reason for this outcome. We have conformed to the critical parameters which are essential for premium results. It is as simple as that!
Do you suppose it is merely coincidence that my system in correlation with the room’s acoustical factors are virtually in sync with the basis for which the designer himself has within his boundaries? The same equipment with very similar room properties would strongly suggest as to why perhaps our understanding of these speakers runs analogous in form. In other words, we have assured an absolutely solid foundation for favorable results. It doesn’t become any clearer than that with any further extension of relevancy.
Quote:“if mine did that I would start using them for something besides stands for other equipment. “
Precisely my point! It is up to you for which to identify and eradicate the real underlying reason for which this statement is predicated upon.
Quote:“ Hopefully the Teres will be the next big step up from the Dual/Rek-O-Kut.”
If you feel that there is a difference between a Mercedes and a Chevy, then this metaphorical example should present the general idea as to how much of a ‘step-up’ the Teres concept actually is.
Quote:But back to speakers, and making HDTs usable.
It is not a question as to whether or not the HDT’s are “usable”. Unless the integrity of the structural quality was breached, or something is amiss within the design implementation (non compliant within specification), the problem most assuredly stems from somewhere else.
Quote:Exactly what are you referring to as "the HDT design once upgraded as shown in my build."
‘Exactly what I am referring to’ is a degree of separation to preclude any doubt that absolute attention to detail with the highest preservation of quality, was instilled and solidified in accordance with my requirements. The general procedure is very close to the standard upgrade. My version of the upgrade contributed a few supplemental aspects which I feel are substantial enough to make a difference, as those ‘small’ details unify to sculpt the overall sound of the structure.
Do not try to read between the lines here, as this is not meant to imply anything other than the fact that I can guarantee the quality of this particular build throughout the process, with the proper degree of modifications intact for maximum performance. My technical performance data clearly proves the credibility within.
The results that I experience from this set of speakers would suggest that I am on the right track with my procedure. I will not argue the extent of difference induced. Rather, I will leave the fact where it remains, that these have proven to be the most refined, and accurate set of speakers across the musical spectrum that I’ve evaluated to this point. They are reference grade and a rarity of musical purity as far as I am concerned about them.
Quote:Is that the longer tubes & different foam inside & different passives of the alternate tuning you're talking about, or is your upgraded build something else?
How much longer are the tubes?
My execution for foam requirements was somewhat different in both grade and placement. The tube length is per specification. However, I dampened the tubes to the point where their resonance factor was modified. I suspect that this if anything would lead to the most noticeable change in characteristics. The addition of structural chamber bracing is highly influential to the cabinets resonance factor. You may have noticed the dampening factor applied by use of the sound deadening application throughout the internal structure. I do not believe that anyone else has applied this tactic to these speakers, at least not to my knowledge. Again, this changes the resonant factor within the structure itself. Whenever this is done, there is ultimately going to be a change in sound presentation, affecting definition and tonal balance to some degree.
........continued..........
Pages: 
